WTB: 16x9 EXII .45x fisheye 72mm for dvx100b

B

Bryan Daniel

Active member
Hey guys, I'm looking to buy a 16x9 EXII .45x fisheye for my dvx100b (72mm). If someone has one that they'd like to sell that is in pristine condition (like new, no scratches or blemishes, etc), please shoot me a pm or reply with pictures and a price.
Or email me at bryanrudnick@aol.com

Thank you!

EDIT: would also be willing to try and work out a deal with someone who has a century .3x Ultra Fisheye adapter aka "Death Lens" (0VS-FE3X-DVX) in pristine condition.

Thanks again
 
Last edited:
Hey guys,
still looking for the 16x9 EXII .45x fisheye for my dvx100b (72mm). Maybe it would help if I specified that the part number as per 16x9 inc's website is "Part No: 169-HDSF45X-72-PAN-DVX100"

Let me know if anyone's got one in pristine condition that they are looking to sell.
Please respond or pm me or email me at bryanrudnick@aol.com

Thanks!
 
Biz said:
Check out this lens made by Opteka.. It is a great cheaper alternative to the 16x9 0.45x.
I just got one and have also used the 16x9inc. lens before and they are essentially the same lens.

http://opteka.com/opteka72mm04xhd2largeelementfisheyelensforprofessionalvideocamcorders.aspx
Click to expand...


How do you like it? Have you used it with a dvx? I've just recently started noticing the .4x opteka as a potential option but haven't had the opportunity to ask someone personally how they like it. The only reason I didn't jump right on it was because I was a bit iffy about the quality, and also concerned with how it would look in both 4:3 and 16:9 on a dvx, because I do not believe I have seen both. Don't get my wrong, I am well aware that you don't have to spend $700 on a century mk2 for quality glass, but for the unbelievable price of the opteka I think it's fair to at least be curious. I believe I have seen the opteka .4x on a dvx shooting 4:3, and that really isn't an issue. I am more concerned with how it will look shooting 16:9. I have seen the video of that lens on the hmc150 many many times and I think it looks UNBELIEVABLE. Is there any reason that it would look any different shooting 16:9 on a dvx? I'd love to know your own personal experience with the lens or if you can point me to some samples I haven't seen.
Thanks!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top