Yellow filters in front of the lens help you alot, when you're shooting black and white, as you are blocking the blue light out, nature seems to look a lot more contrasty. This is a typical trick, that BW still photographers have used for ages to enhance their pictures.
Using an HPX170 I can clearly see a difference. Not that I have used yellow filters, but in post-production, I can see that when I make my footage yellow/red theres a lot more detail than when I make my footage BLUEish. Probably something to do with that the color red is a color with more luminance than blue, hence more detail.
Well...then I was thinking. What if I use a yellow/reddish filter in front of my lens, but then set my internal white balance on the camera to a lower Kelvin degree, to compensate for my yellow picture, making it neutral again. Will this leave me at the same place as when I did not use a yellow filter in front of my lens, using a standard 5600K white balance outdoor? Or will it leave me with more detail in the skies?
Using an HPX170 I can clearly see a difference. Not that I have used yellow filters, but in post-production, I can see that when I make my footage yellow/red theres a lot more detail than when I make my footage BLUEish. Probably something to do with that the color red is a color with more luminance than blue, hence more detail.
Well...then I was thinking. What if I use a yellow/reddish filter in front of my lens, but then set my internal white balance on the camera to a lower Kelvin degree, to compensate for my yellow picture, making it neutral again. Will this leave me at the same place as when I did not use a yellow filter in front of my lens, using a standard 5600K white balance outdoor? Or will it leave me with more detail in the skies?
Last edited: