Doing some pre-purchase research about a "B" UHD video camera.
The prolific author at the "A Suggestion of Motion" site has written a lot about employing adapters to use a full-frame lens with the GH4, all of it positive. E.g. this.
The author of this video flatly states that using an adapted lens is a bad idea because the significant cropping of a full-frame lens results in loss of sharpness.
I've got several high-end Nikkor G zoom lenses, and using them with the GH4 seems attractive. I'm not worried about light loss because there's usually plenty of light available, and a decreased FOV doesn't seem a problem because of my lens assortment. So I don't see the need for a speedbooster.
What's reality in actual practice?
The prolific author at the "A Suggestion of Motion" site has written a lot about employing adapters to use a full-frame lens with the GH4, all of it positive. E.g. this.
The author of this video flatly states that using an adapted lens is a bad idea because the significant cropping of a full-frame lens results in loss of sharpness.
I've got several high-end Nikkor G zoom lenses, and using them with the GH4 seems attractive. I'm not worried about light loss because there's usually plenty of light available, and a decreased FOV doesn't seem a problem because of my lens assortment. So I don't see the need for a speedbooster.
What's reality in actual practice?