puredrifting
Major Contributor
Jason:
What an intelligent and knowing observation about the state of the film BUSINESS!
Dan
What an intelligent and knowing observation about the state of the film BUSINESS!
Dan
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I don't hate him because of his work, i hate him because of who he is. I've spent a few weeks on two of michael bay's sets in close proximity to him. he's a dickhead. straight up.
To hijack a phrase, "What's good isn't always popular and what's popular isn't always good."Bay is to film what boy bands and pop stars are to music. They will always have a place in the industry because they speak to our simplest human reactions, and much as we AS WE FILM MAKERS deny it. This is want most of middle America wants out of a motion picture.
"Middle America" is just another term for "Average Joe", "Anytown, USA", etc.,. "Middle America" isn't a place it's a demographic.Why do people blame middle America for crappy movies? I've lived in middle America my whole life and we're no more inclined to see or not see a piece of junk as anyone on the coasts.
I agree. I was working at Company 3 when he was doing DI for Transformers and from what I saw, working in some proximity with him, he is a wanker. That seemed to be the general consensus with the staff there too. But hey, it is the movie business, right? His films keep a lot of people employed and he is obviously good at giving his audience what they want so he is a successful filmmaker. Lots of directors are idiots but they are good directors. Cameron comes to mind.
Dan
Why do people blame middle America for crappy movies? I've lived in middle America my whole life and we're no more inclined to see or not see a piece of junk as anyone on the coasts.
Maybe there's a connection between difficult personalities and successful directors? Maybe there's not much room for love on the difficult path to making a really good movie. There are so many people who want something from the film (like a paycheque to start with), but only a small handful who really care whether it is great or not.
I dunno. Hard to get good help. Hard to get respect. And maybe in the end the ones who do are the a**holes. I wish it were otherwise, but I'm not sure...
Zak Forsman said:george clooney, soderbergh, m. night, judd apatow and most others i've seen in action foster a friendly, sometimes family-like, and creatively nurturing atmosphere on set. being a d*ck isn't necessary to be a "top" director.
george clooney, soderbergh, m. night, judd apatow and most others i've seen in action foster a friendly, sometimes family-like, and creatively nurturing atmosphere on set. being a d*ck isn't necessary to be a "top" director.
You have to admit there are a LOT of directors who do not have cuddly personalities: Kubrick was hardly a sweetie; David O Russel; James Cameron; etc.
I'm usually not at a total loss for a metaphor, but comparing Michael Bay to Jim Cameron, in terms of persoanlity, professionalism, and on-set behavior, is like (insert unflattering metaphor I can't think of, here).
indie/foreign/etc don't really play in rural america, do they?
I don't believe Cameron belongs in the same class of crazy/jerkfulness as Kubrick and Russel, although I can only compare his behavior, to their reputations.
Well, to be honest, I only say Bay working in post, not on set. Cameron is legendary for his crew abuse, but he is a talented filmmaker. I guess Bay is talented at what he does, which is make movies that make a lot of money.
Same with Brett Ratner. I have interviewed him several times, he is a complete ass, but he puts people into theaters to see his films, I have to give him that.
Dan