Why bother with the Varicam?

uh... about 700 less pixels across. When would that matter? Film out... but in 10 years what theater is going to project with film anyway? HD-DVD or Blueray might be softer. (might..) Broadcast? Probably not unless DirectHD gets a better codec. So how many people right now would need it? I would bet less than more would need it.


How is it 700 fewer pixels across?
 
Do you have any ideas as to if the "Varicam II" would be P2 recording or not? And does Panasonic do any Beta testing with actual productions?
 
Of course it would be P2 -- that's the only way you can record AVC-Intra, and I'd bet my HVX that the new VariCam will use AVC-Intra.

I don't know if they do field beta testing or not, but if they did I'm certain it would be among existing VariCam owners.
 
NO, it doesn't! if you think it does, then you are dreaming.

WOW! Thanks for the tip. Maybe I need to up my meds.

Of course Varicam is going to give you a much more sophisticated approach after all you pay for that privilege. That doesnt mean that the approach on the HPX isn't aimed at achieving the same thing.

I wasn't trying to belittle your Varicam.
 
Of course it would be P2 -- that's the only way you can record AVC-Intra, and I'd bet my HVX that the new VariCam will use AVC-Intra.

I don't know if they do field beta testing or not, but if they did I'm certain it would be among existing VariCam owners.

Barry, maybe they introduce avc-intra in tape format with the Varicam 2?
 
Tape's deader than dead. IINM, nobody's made a new tape format since HDV in 2004. Adios, sayonara, don't let the door hit ya where nature split ya, see ya tape.
 
Yea... time flies... already even with pro-sumer 200's with only 2 slots you get 34min non-stop of 1080p... all nails are in the coffin' with 68min of DVCPRO HD on the 500 and newer without stopping... soon it will be 2:16 hs!!! nice...

I want to know one thing... and you big boys might know where to point me towards... what cameras compare to the A900 Panavised?
 
Back
Top