lasondas
Member
What follows is stupid, I know, but it was my first film, and with all the things going on, on the subject of White Balance, I used what I usually despise: denial.
I bought a DVX-100a to film a short I wrote, and maybe hit the white balance once, then filmed the whole thing (total 70 hours). In shadow, sunlight, overcast, inside, sunrise, sunset mostly natural light except for the inside.
There is two scenes where each character looks very pale and "blue".
i'm not saying it doesn't need color correction, but there wasn't too many terrible/unusable aspects (it's a first film guerilla shot, so it's got plenty other problems), and sometimes the shots are true and beautiful.
Why might that be?
Is what you see in the LCD what you get, or can our eyes not pick up the differences?
Possibly did I have it set on AWB, and that let me squeak on by?
I'm going to bring the white card and constantly manually set it from now on, but I thought maybe some of you would have feedback.
Thanks,
Art
I bought a DVX-100a to film a short I wrote, and maybe hit the white balance once, then filmed the whole thing (total 70 hours). In shadow, sunlight, overcast, inside, sunrise, sunset mostly natural light except for the inside.
There is two scenes where each character looks very pale and "blue".
i'm not saying it doesn't need color correction, but there wasn't too many terrible/unusable aspects (it's a first film guerilla shot, so it's got plenty other problems), and sometimes the shots are true and beautiful.
Why might that be?
Is what you see in the LCD what you get, or can our eyes not pick up the differences?
Possibly did I have it set on AWB, and that let me squeak on by?
I'm going to bring the white card and constantly manually set it from now on, but I thought maybe some of you would have feedback.
Thanks,
Art