What is better lightscribe or printing direct to disc?
- Thread starter glkl
- Start date
ullanta
Veteran
If you ask me, Lightscribe is pretty lame in many ways.
1) Media is expensive
2) You have to flip the disc over by hand
3) It's wicked slow
4) Doesn't look that great in the end - more like a watermark
With the new glossy waterproof media, inkjet printing looks very nice an d doesn't smear. It's color, better looking, faster, cheaper. I use a Primera Bravo SE (~$1400) which can burn & print up to 20 discs at a time unattended.
1) Media is expensive
2) You have to flip the disc over by hand
3) It's wicked slow
4) Doesn't look that great in the end - more like a watermark
With the new glossy waterproof media, inkjet printing looks very nice an d doesn't smear. It's color, better looking, faster, cheaper. I use a Primera Bravo SE (~$1400) which can burn & print up to 20 discs at a time unattended.
Last edited:
Hawk Teflon
Veteran
I'll second that. I've been looking around recently, and that's an incredible bet! I used to have a lightscribe. I never loved it. It was fine, but no love.
Lightscribe is a kinda cool effect, but has more drawbacks than features. Aforementioned reasons.
e
e