I bought a “Universal” (a no-brand, to be sure) set of four 82mm “close-up” lenses for my HVX.
They are ‘close-up+1’ and ‘close-up+2”, which really look just like UV filters, then there is ‘close-up+4’, twice as thick ring with some detectable curve in the lens, and finally ‘close-up macro’, which is 3 times thicker than a filter with quite a bit of convexity.
I shot my hand from close range with all four and without, and the only difference I noticed was that the biggest one (macro) brought it closer to camera. But I could achieve the same effect by simply moving my hand closer to lens. Shot in Cine D 24p 1/24 . At 100% size in Final Cut Pro, I could notice no difference whatsoever in detail between with and without any of the lenses. What am I missing?
Thanks.
p.s. why do so many wide-angle adapters come with a macro lens attached when it more or less cancels the fisheye effect?
They are ‘close-up+1’ and ‘close-up+2”, which really look just like UV filters, then there is ‘close-up+4’, twice as thick ring with some detectable curve in the lens, and finally ‘close-up macro’, which is 3 times thicker than a filter with quite a bit of convexity.
I shot my hand from close range with all four and without, and the only difference I noticed was that the biggest one (macro) brought it closer to camera. But I could achieve the same effect by simply moving my hand closer to lens. Shot in Cine D 24p 1/24 . At 100% size in Final Cut Pro, I could notice no difference whatsoever in detail between with and without any of the lenses. What am I missing?
Thanks.
p.s. why do so many wide-angle adapters come with a macro lens attached when it more or less cancels the fisheye effect?