VR Lens Experiences?

fotobywes

Active member
I've primarily been a still photographer for the past couple decades, and so I have several Nikkor Vibration Reduction (VR) lenses in my kit. I absolutely love the sharpness and bokeh of the VR f/2.8 80-200, and while the VR 24-120 is a little slower (f/3.5-5.6), I still use it on just about every shoot.

As with most other aspects of D90 digital video, the Vibration Reduction has a lot of room for improvement. I've found that the VR on the 24-120 tends to be rather jerky, even when I'm using a tripod or monopod. Instead of smoothly compensating for lens shake, the VR seems to jerk from one side to the other. I guess that's probably a result of its origins in still photography. I'd share some of my 24-120 VR footage, but thus far it's been so appalling that it hasn't been worth saving. I'm hoping that maybe in time Nikon will release a firmware update that will address the VR jerkiness, but I won't hold my breath waiting...

On the other hand, the VR on the 80-200 has performed quite well in video mode. The 80-200 offers two VR modes- one that compensates for only vertical lens shake, and a second, "Active," mode which compensates for both vertical and horizontal lens shake.

When mounted to a tripod via the lens collar and in the Active mode, I've found that the VR substantially smooths tilts and pans. I haven't had the opportunity yet to try the 80-200 VR on a monopod, but my gut feeling is that the results wouldn't be all that pretty.

Has anyone else used Nikkor VR lenses successfully on the D90?
 
I've primarily been a still photographer for the past couple decades, and so I have several Nikkor Vibration Reduction (VR) lenses in my kit. I absolutely love the sharpness and bokeh of the VR f/2.8 80-200, and while the VR 24-120 is a little slower (f/3.5-5.6), I still use it on just about every shoot.

As with most other aspects of D90 digital video, the Vibration Reduction has a lot of room for improvement. I've found that the VR on the 24-120 tends to be rather jerky, even when I'm using a tripod or monopod. Instead of smoothly compensating for lens shake, the VR seems to jerk from one side to the other. I guess that's probably a result of its origins in still photography. I'd share some of my 24-120 VR footage, but thus far it's been so appalling that it hasn't been worth saving. I'm hoping that maybe in time Nikon will release a firmware update that will address the VR jerkiness, but I won't hold my breath waiting...

On the other hand, the VR on the 80-200 has performed quite well in video mode. The 80-200 offers two VR modes- one that compensates for only vertical lens shake, and a second, "Active," mode which compensates for both vertical and horizontal lens shake.

When mounted to a tripod via the lens collar and in the Active mode, I've found that the VR substantially smooths tilts and pans. I haven't had the opportunity yet to try the 80-200 VR on a monopod, but my gut feeling is that the results wouldn't be all that pretty.

Has anyone else used Nikkor VR lenses successfully on the D90?

Well the kit lens the D90 ships with has VR.....18-105mm 3.5-5.6 VR

No reported problems...i also film with a 50mm 1.8 and 1.4 and have no issues either. But the kit lens 18-105 is not the VR w/ active mode...so it might be even better to use a lens that has..
 
18-200 vr

18-200 vr

I just received my d90 a week ago. My 18-200 with VR has active mode. It works great with a tripod and my 501. Have not had much time to play with it yet.
 
Maybe it's me...

Maybe it's me...

I skipped buying the D90 kit lens because it duplicated better lenses in my kit. So I can't compare the performance of my VR 24-120 to the kit lens.

I think I'll borrow another 24-120 & test it on my D90: it's possible that my 24-120 is in need of maintenance & is not performing up to par.
 
I think the kit lens (18 to 105) is great. I don't even want to take it off. That could introduce dust, and I'm still in the hey, its too new to chance it mode. The first thing I did was to throw on the UV lens, and swear I'd leave the kit lens attached for at least a year. Which is about how long it will take until I start wanting a fish eye, and some longer zooms. I don't like primes even if they are faster. They seem too restricting and inefficient in comparison. Outside in the day light, I prefer a slower lens, and inside I can light the shots. At night..... you got me there.
 
Instead of smoothly compensating for lens shake, the VR seems to jerk from one side to the other. I guess that's probably a result of its origins in still photography.

Don't worry I have the new HMC152 and when on tripod it also exhibits the jerkiness you talk about.

Has anyone else used Nikkor VR lenses successfully on the D90?

I bought the body only because I already have a bunch of primes & older 35mm SLR zooms, however, I just ordered the DX 18-55 VR kit lens so I'm also interested in others thoughts.

I read a great review on it at Ken Rockwell's site. www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/
If you've never been there check it out, this guy rocks!!
 
Back
Top