Hi all!
I’ve been playing with both VFR and Interval recording, and came across something I’m trying to get my head around because I stumbled onto something a bit unexpected so I’m looking for either validation or perhaps an explanation so I can better understand this. Now, I’VE READ THE MANUALS and Barry’s book, so I based my experiments on this.
The setup is simple. I took the camera to work early to shoot some test time-lapse TYPE shots using both modes. Taken at night from the parking lot of my office. Wanted to see if I could get some cool streaking of the car lights as they went past.
Here’s the breakdown and a link to the test footage if the embedded player isn't: https://vimeo.com/196959604:
Scenario 1:
Camera set to record on a 30fps timeline; UHD 2160; 100M; Dual record to 1080. Set interval record to 1 second; shutter manual to .5 sec; iris manually to open; 500 iso.
Set camera to run about 8 minutes.
What I got:
On playback I got 8 minutes of footage! One frame of “stuff” followed by about 15 frames duplicated, then the next real frame of “stuff” followed by 15 duplicated. But it did come out in UHD 2160. To get the effect I was after, I sped it up in post x15 and added a slight delay.
Scenario 2:
Rotated camera 180 degrees to get traffic from a different angle (to keep me from getting confused with scenes/settings when I got home); reset to 1080; used VFR @ 2FPS; manual shutter @ ½ sec; manual iris at 4.5; high sense at 2000 iso. A bit noisier.
Camera recorded for a bit over 9 minutes.
What I got:
footage runs about 19 seconds, as expected in a “time lapse” type scenario, and was in 1080. Each frame a different shot. Pretty much as one would expect. Had a bit more noise, but this was a test!
Question!
Scenario 2 ran as expected. Each frame being a separate exposure. But scenario 1 I am puzzled by. Is the camera, by being told to take a picture every second with a ½ sec exposure, doing as its told then going back and “adding” about 15 frames of the same stuff to fill in the timeline? It would seem so rather than taking each exposure sequentially without the “filler” frames. I didn’t think on interval record it would do this! I was expecting about 17-18 seconds of playback footage rather than a very “choppy” 8 minutes essentially playing back in “real time”. Am I tripping over a circumstance of using such a long shutter and would not encounter this if I was shooting in daylight with anything faster 1/30 sec? Seems like when I used interval to do some cloud movements during daylight I didn’t encounter this. I’m coming from a DSLR mindset with this, whereby a long exposure on a time-lapse would still “count” as 1 frame, but the DVX is doing something a bit different under interval record than was expected. Now, it’s not really a problem, just trying to understand a bit better what’s in play here as I wasn’t expecting the camera to do what it did! But that’s why I play around with a lot of tests…
I’ve been playing with both VFR and Interval recording, and came across something I’m trying to get my head around because I stumbled onto something a bit unexpected so I’m looking for either validation or perhaps an explanation so I can better understand this. Now, I’VE READ THE MANUALS and Barry’s book, so I based my experiments on this.
The setup is simple. I took the camera to work early to shoot some test time-lapse TYPE shots using both modes. Taken at night from the parking lot of my office. Wanted to see if I could get some cool streaking of the car lights as they went past.
Here’s the breakdown and a link to the test footage if the embedded player isn't: https://vimeo.com/196959604:
Scenario 1:
Camera set to record on a 30fps timeline; UHD 2160; 100M; Dual record to 1080. Set interval record to 1 second; shutter manual to .5 sec; iris manually to open; 500 iso.
Set camera to run about 8 minutes.
What I got:
On playback I got 8 minutes of footage! One frame of “stuff” followed by about 15 frames duplicated, then the next real frame of “stuff” followed by 15 duplicated. But it did come out in UHD 2160. To get the effect I was after, I sped it up in post x15 and added a slight delay.
Scenario 2:
Rotated camera 180 degrees to get traffic from a different angle (to keep me from getting confused with scenes/settings when I got home); reset to 1080; used VFR @ 2FPS; manual shutter @ ½ sec; manual iris at 4.5; high sense at 2000 iso. A bit noisier.
Camera recorded for a bit over 9 minutes.
What I got:
footage runs about 19 seconds, as expected in a “time lapse” type scenario, and was in 1080. Each frame a different shot. Pretty much as one would expect. Had a bit more noise, but this was a test!
Question!
Scenario 2 ran as expected. Each frame being a separate exposure. But scenario 1 I am puzzled by. Is the camera, by being told to take a picture every second with a ½ sec exposure, doing as its told then going back and “adding” about 15 frames of the same stuff to fill in the timeline? It would seem so rather than taking each exposure sequentially without the “filler” frames. I didn’t think on interval record it would do this! I was expecting about 17-18 seconds of playback footage rather than a very “choppy” 8 minutes essentially playing back in “real time”. Am I tripping over a circumstance of using such a long shutter and would not encounter this if I was shooting in daylight with anything faster 1/30 sec? Seems like when I used interval to do some cloud movements during daylight I didn’t encounter this. I’m coming from a DSLR mindset with this, whereby a long exposure on a time-lapse would still “count” as 1 frame, but the DVX is doing something a bit different under interval record than was expected. Now, it’s not really a problem, just trying to understand a bit better what’s in play here as I wasn’t expecting the camera to do what it did! But that’s why I play around with a lot of tests…