Looking for your opinions, or better yet for anyone who has done a comparison... My project will be alot of fast moving action. Probably half of the footage for the project will need to be slowed down (either in post or in cam). The other half of the footage will be "real time". Not all of the "slowed down" footage will be slowed down to 50%- some will be 70-80%.
My question is... If I shoot in 720P 30PN and Acquire at a 60 Frame Rate (in camera 50% slow mo) would 720P 60P acquired at 60 Frames and slowed down to 50% in post give me the same quality.
Same question the other way... Would 720P 60P at 60 Frames give me better resolution at 100% speed than "speeding up" the 30PN/60Fr footage to 200%Since at least half the footage will be either slowed down (or sped up, if I end up going 720/30PN @ 60 Fr), I am just looking to see what is going to give me the best looking footage overall.
I have done my own tests- I just want to see what everyone else thinks to see if my thinking is along the same lines.
Opinions? Hope this wasnt TOO confusing. Thanks.
My question is... If I shoot in 720P 30PN and Acquire at a 60 Frame Rate (in camera 50% slow mo) would 720P 60P acquired at 60 Frames and slowed down to 50% in post give me the same quality.
Same question the other way... Would 720P 60P at 60 Frames give me better resolution at 100% speed than "speeding up" the 30PN/60Fr footage to 200%Since at least half the footage will be either slowed down (or sped up, if I end up going 720/30PN @ 60 Fr), I am just looking to see what is going to give me the best looking footage overall.
I have done my own tests- I just want to see what everyone else thinks to see if my thinking is along the same lines.
Opinions? Hope this wasnt TOO confusing. Thanks.