Sorry - trying to work through my own issues with RCM late at night while offering advice to others is not a good idea.
No apology needed. Thanks for the helpful inputs and keep'em coming.:thumbup:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Sorry - trying to work through my own issues with RCM late at night while offering advice to others is not a good idea.
Conlorspace transformations project the full dynamic rango onto the target colorspace. So in case of a Rec.709 target colorspace, which is very narrow, it is as designed that the resulting range spans beyond 100%. It's not a bug, it's truly a feature!I did some more testing in Resolve today and found out that in either an RCM timeline (REC709) or doing a color transform on each clip in a non CM timeline the key thing is to leave the options for tone and gamut mapping off (none) Although this then looks very clipped in the scopes and over exposed if you set the pivot value to zero and then use contrast to pull the data back within the REC709 range it can be easily graded with the wheels and looks very good indeed with the absence of the highly compressed highlights that comes with the auto tone mapping options and general 'milkeyness' that people complain about. I know it's not a quick fix but it is the best looking result I have got so far in getting HLG into REC709 by far! (It also does wonders on S-LOG )
Conlorspace transformations project the full dynamic rango onto the target colorspace. So in case of a Rec.709 target colorspace, which is very narrow, it is as designed that the resulting range spans beyond 100%. It's not a bug, it's truly a feature!
It is up to the color corrector/grader to map the wide range onto the small Rec.709 range. Usually this is done by rolling off the blacks and whites with an s-curve, the point here is to keep the midtones as much having the natural contrast while the extremes have to be compromized. In that sense grading HDR is actually easier (provided you have a good monitor) than SDR, for SDR you need to go through more hoops.
I personally would stay away from tonemapping (with the possible exception of mapping over 1000 nit values for HDR), it's like one of those 'auto modes' or LUTs which will never fit for all scenes.
Should rather go to Resolve and use either ACES or RCM to do that instead of converting to Rec709 first and then Rec2020. That's kinda like changing resolution to SD first then resizing to 4K again lol.