Phil Rhodes
Well-known member
I'm not sure that what's being proposed here is post ramping. The camera is ramping, producing correct motion blur for the effective frame rate. It's just padding the output with duplicate frames so that the recording is always at (almost ) 60p. The postprocessing is intended to remove the duplicate frames, as the Sony recorder would have done automatically based on SDI metadata.
It would probably not be that difficult to write code to allow a recorder to read and act on this Sony-proprietary metadata, but I can understand why the likes of Convergent Design and Atomos probably don't think it's a particularly worthwhile way to spend their time, given the tiny audience. Shame.
I would reiterate the idea that recording ProRes and doing dupe frame removal with something like ffmpeg would probably be less fiddly, and I don't think it would necessarily be that much more or less of a time sink simply because the files would be so much smaller.
P
It would probably not be that difficult to write code to allow a recorder to read and act on this Sony-proprietary metadata, but I can understand why the likes of Convergent Design and Atomos probably don't think it's a particularly worthwhile way to spend their time, given the tiny audience. Shame.
I would reiterate the idea that recording ProRes and doing dupe frame removal with something like ffmpeg would probably be less fiddly, and I don't think it would necessarily be that much more or less of a time sink simply because the files would be so much smaller.
P