Top 10 Films of All Time

Also, for those who list Vanilla Sky, you should check out the 1997 original, Abre los ojos by Alejandro Amenebar(who also directed The Sea Inside, The Others, and Thesis).
I think it is the better version, plus it's the original.
 
Dude, judging from the responses so far, it seems like most people haven't seen Kane....or The Bicycle Thieves, The Third Man, Lawrence Of Arabia, Raging Bull, La Dolce Vita, La Regle Du Jeu, 8 1/2, The Passion of Joan of Arc, and a whole bunch of other great films.

This thread could be the top ten films of last 12 years, or top ten films made during the 17 years you've been alive.

Don't be afraid to see Citizen Kane. Odds are a few of the directors you look up to consider it a masterpiece, and have found it influential. It isn't boring at all, nor is Casablanca...not if cinematography, mis en scene, and strong performances interest you.

You're not one of those people who eschews black and white films, are you? I'd guess that you are not, since you have Schindler's List jotted down.


Not to say that the movies you have mentioned are not great, but the main reason why people say that they are the greatest is because they were the first. But being first should not automatically give them a spot in the top films of all time. It is a stepping stone from which most films of today can be traced back to (story, filming techniques), but if you take a look, you will see that many films of the past twenty years have met and surpassed the level of Citizen Kane.
 
Last edited:
pdsage10, good call on A.I. I think we're the only two people who liked this movie.
Also, for those who list Vanilla Sky, you should check out the 1997 original, Abre los ojos by Alejandro Amenebar(who also directed The Sea Inside, The Others, and Thesis).
I think it is the better version, plus it's the original.

I agree with you, don't know why I didn't list the original, but the acting was so much better in the original still a great love story in either language.




Not to hi-jack, but DeSica is absolutely right.

We've got some interesting conversations going in the 100 Films forums (click any link below) on benchmark motion pictures that are considered required viewing for new and established filmmakers alike.

I'd like to challenge anyone who predominantly favors films (by 50% or more) produced within the past twenty-five years in their Top 10 to participate in one or more of our 100 Films discussions.

There is a great deal that can be learned through the study of older pictures even as we all struggle to stay on top of the newest emerging techniques and technologies. Please add your voice to the conversation!

Cheers,

e

I'll check the thread out.

But, I gotta see that Pan's Labyrinth, it seems to be in alot of everyone's top ten.. I gotta see what I'm missing.

And not to start a Citizen Kane War, but I saw this movie, sure it's considered to be a masterpiece by most, but the basic element of loving a film is the story. And I thought the story wasn't that good. As for it being great film making, maybe it should be on another list by itself like the top ten technical film, but not the top ten film... now ofcourse this is only my opinion:grin:
 
You make a good point with regards to some films, but I have never seen anything remotely close to surpassing 8 1/2, Lawrence of Arabia, Raging Bull, The Third Man, La Dolce Vita in context to what those film were doing. Maybe with a Citizen Kane, sure.

When making best of lists and talking about choices there are always going to be sweeping generalizations that kind of throw off focus.

Please give an example of how a movie has used similar techniques to the aforementioned films and done it better. I can't think of any. I think that is why they are so timeless and astonishing.
 
Not to hi-jack, but DeSica is absolutely right.

We've got some interesting conversations going in the 100 Films forums (click any link below) on benchmark motion pictures that are considered required viewing for new and established filmmakers alike.

I'd like to challenge anyone who predominantly favors films (by 50% or more) produced within the past twenty-five years in their Top 10 to participate in one or more of our 100 Films discussions.

There is a great deal that can be learned through the study of older pictures even as we all struggle to stay on top of the newest emerging techniques and technologies. Please add your voice to the conversation!

Cheers,

e

Ha ha, this thread is AWESOME. But beyond "There is a great deal that can be learned." (thanks for making it sound like school, Erik :) ), there are genuinely great films from the whole history of the medium. Greed is still one of the most powerful films I have ever seen.

A common problem though is that many folks are incapable of overcoming their own prejudices and tastes to even know how to look at something that is not what they are used to, meaning something that looks like THEM. This is the result of a lack of education (not only in films, but in everything else as well). I'm sure there are many people in the world today who would rank Harry Potter books as better than Tolstoy or Dickens or Faulkner.

Anyway, not trying to be a dick, but for the love of God people, listen to Erik and go take part in that thread and watch some films!!! :)

And trust me, my own education in European Film is nothing short of pathetic.

I'll take a my top films off the top of my head:

Greed
Ran
His Girl Friday
Raiders of the Lost Ark
Talk to Her
Once Upon a Time in the West
Mother Night
2001
The Conversation
 
You make a good point with regards to some films, but I have never seen anything remotely close to surpassing 8 1/2, Lawrence of Arabia, Raging Bull, The Third Man, La Dolce Vita in context to what those film were doing. Maybe with a Citizen Kane, sure.

When making best of lists and talking about choices there are always going to be sweeping generalizations that kind of throw off focus.

Please give an example of how a movie has used similar techniques to the aforementioned films and done it better. I can't think of any. I think that is why they are so timeless and astonishing.

I have watched Raging Bull about five times, but cant even recall a techique that was used that I have not seen before. Help me out here and tell me what specifically you are looking for.
 
Mark,

You have moved solidly into my Circle of Favorites with the inclusion of Greed in your all-time top 10.

Eventually, we'll depart from the AFI 100 Years 100 Films list in favor of even more challenging material - say, for instance, three consecutive Jean Vigo films over three months.

When I started the 100 Films Discussions, I was thinking, "Okay, this is like a DVXUser Critical Film Studies Course 101 By Amatuers for Everyone".

e
 
Last edited:
Technique was the wrong word. What I was trying to ask was which films have met and surpassed the films listed? And are they better films? If you just meant Citizen Kane, then I agree with you.
I do think that films copy techniques and surpass them on a technical level, but rarely do they have the story and drama to make the technique only an element of greater whole. These films have the whole package in my opinion. No weaknesses.

On a side note, one of the most impressive things about Raging Bull is how convincingly they execute showing Jake's character over a long span of time. I really feel like he is getting older, and I know that it is Deniro, but still I am convinced. But that is only one element of the film.

Edit: And if you do know a film that is like La Dolce Vita or 8 1/2 but better, please let me know 'cause I will be heading to video store in 2 shakes.
 
Last edited:
Not to say that the movies you have mentioned are not great, but the main reason why people say that they are the greatest is because they were the first. But being first should not automatically give them a spot in the top films of all time. It is a stepping stone from which most films of today can be traced back to (story, filming techniques), but if you take a look, you will see that many films of the past twenty years have met and surpassed the level of Citizen Kane.

Really? How so?

How are these films among the first? You know they have been making films for over 100 years, right? Did you see any Lumiere brothers stuff on the list? The Great Train Robbery was wildly innovative and a technical milestone back in 1903, and I have seen it, but it wouldn't make the top ten on any day for me.

I just saw The Passion of Joan of Arc a week or so ago...almost 80 years after it was made, and I thought it was amazing. after seeing it, i found out that the original negative was destroyed, and that this version was pieced together with cuts that Dreyer had originally discarded. The guy made a better film with what he was going to chuck than most direcors have made with their "best" of twelve takes.

I may have to agree with Pauline Kael when she says Renee Falconetti's performance "may be the finest performance ever recorded on film." It really was that good.

As for Kane, it isn't my favourite film, but it does seem to creep into my posts, largely due to it being brought up for one reason or another. I grew up on the films from the last 25 years. I have seen more films than just about anyone I know, including directors and movie executives, and maybe even a few of my instructors. Not just good movies, but some real crap, too. I had inkling of wanting to make movies since I was 18 or so, but when I saw Hud at 19 or 20, I knew I loved films, and that I would only truly be happy if I could one day make them.

I was 26 years old when I saw Kane, I had already heard all the talk and the hype, and I was still blown away. The choice of angles and shot composition in relation to emotion and narrative alone could merit a week's worth of discussion. Todays' stuff often has dutch angles and exaggerated shots without any regard for what they are supposed to mean in relation to the events on screen. There's a whole bunch of style for style's sake.

I have been moved by many films, and there are a great number of films I watch repeatedly because I am drawn to them for some reason, but nothing has ever made the impression that Kane did (except maybe The Bicycle Thieves). It was like a slap in the face, and it made me want to cry, as Caesar did at 24 when he thought of all that Alexander had achieved at 18, because I knew I had just seen greatness, and that I myself may never come close to it in anything I ever manage to do.
 
Last edited:
It is hard for generations to appreciate the works before them if only due to lack of exposure I think.

I'm a 70's baby, and most of my 'favortie ever's' are from the 70's - 90's and a bit O 00's

I love cinema, period.

I have been known to shun the art house guy; the one who swears Tarkovsky is the best ever and all is s hit. I appreciate anything that kicks ass, why not like Tarkovsky and Spielberg ?

And yes, Lawrence of Arabia and Raging Bull are epic. That's why I hate TOP 10 lists; too short. : /
 
Shoot! John, I forgot Tarkovsky! He blows my mind. But it doesn't get on my nerves anymore when people don't dig him. He is definitely not for everyone. I like other stuff too, though. I love Raiders.
 
Hey Jg Marceaux

How do you rank Pan's on your list. I see you have it the top. I think cinematographers and editors alike, should study that movie.
It's my top pick. Words really can't describe how phenomenal this movie is. It's a modern day masterpiece.

Mulholland Drive, is definitely not a movie for everyone, but people either really like it or they don't at all.
This movie had me thinking about it for weeks afterward. This is the closest experience, cinematically, that you can have to reliving someone else's dream.
 
It is hard for generations to appreciate the works before them if only due to lack of exposure I think.

For some, yes. That's why I wonder at how some pople don't think past a certain level. If you enjoy a certain band, don't you start to explore their influences? Why not explore the films that your favourite film person finds fascinating?

I'm a 70's baby, and most of my 'favortie ever's' are from the 70's - 90's and a bit O 00's
Same here. Lots of my favourites are from during my lifetime.

I was maybe 7 or 8 years old when Raging Bull came out. I saw it the night before I was set to return home after spending a couple of months in Italy when I was 19 (I think I may have seen it once before). When I landed, after a 12 hour flight, I had my father pass by a video store and we watched it that night. I must have watched it like 6 times in the next two weeks.

I love cinema, period.
Exactly.

why not like Tarkovsky and Spielberg ?
You can. Who said otherwise?

And yes, Lawrence of Arabia and Raging Bull are epic.
Not merely epic...timeless.

That's why I hate TOP 10 lists; too short. : /
For sure.
 
Dude, judging from the responses so far, it seems like most people haven't seen Kane....or The Bicycle Thieves, The Third Man, Lawrence Of Arabia, Raging Bull, La Dolce Vita, La Regle Du Jeu, 8 1/2, The Passion of Joan of Arc, and a whole bunch of other great films.

This thread could be the top ten films of last 12 years, or top ten films made during the 17 years you've been alive.

Don't be afraid to see Citizen Kane. Odds are a few of the directors you look up to consider it a masterpiece, and have found it influential. It isn't boring at all, nor is Casablanca...not if cinematography, mis en scene, and strong performances interest you.

You're not one of those people who eschews black and white films, are you? I'd guess that you are not, since you have Schindler's List jotted down.

I saw Kane. It sucked. Saw Casablanca too. Wasn't much better. In the days of those films they were still practicing. I've yet to see a great film from that era.
 
I have watched Raging Bull about five times, but cant even recall a techique that was used that I have not seen before. Help me out here and tell me what specifically you are looking for.

Raging Bull was great, but the best ever? I liked Goodfellas and Taxi Driver both better.
 
Phil Maker,

Everyone is certainly going to have different tastes. But can you at least describe how Casablanca sucked? Why did it suck?
 
Phil Maker,

Everyone is certainly going to have different tastes. But can you at least describe how Casablanca sucked? Why did it suck?

I didn't say it sucked. I said it wasn't much better. It was ok. I didn't relate to it. The ending wasn't so good. The acting was fake. The writing was contrived.
 
01 The Wind and the Lion
02 Braveheart
03 Blade Runner
04 Aliens
05 Tombstone
06 Schindler's List
07 Body Heat
08 The Outlaw Josie Wales
09 The Man Who Would Be King
10 Chinatown
 
I think we've had more discussion on Citizen Kane in this thread than we did in the original 100 Films Discussion thread.

For reference, here it is.

http://66.225.214.124/~dvxuser/V6/showthread.php?t=85801&highlight=films+citizen+kane

Never too late to resurrect one of those threads and carry on the conversation.

My list?

1: Raiders of the Lost Ark
2: Blade Runner
3: Star Wars - 1977
4: 2001: A Space Odyssee
5: The Godfather
6: Apocalypse Now
7: Citizen Kane
8: Close Encounters of the 3rd Kind
9: Annie Hall
10: M

With mild fluctuation, but even then it still leans embarrassingly modern.
 
Back
Top