Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Dude, judging from the responses so far, it seems like most people haven't seen Kane....or The Bicycle Thieves, The Third Man, Lawrence Of Arabia, Raging Bull, La Dolce Vita, La Regle Du Jeu, 8 1/2, The Passion of Joan of Arc, and a whole bunch of other great films.
This thread could be the top ten films of last 12 years, or top ten films made during the 17 years you've been alive.
Don't be afraid to see Citizen Kane. Odds are a few of the directors you look up to consider it a masterpiece, and have found it influential. It isn't boring at all, nor is Casablanca...not if cinematography, mis en scene, and strong performances interest you.
You're not one of those people who eschews black and white films, are you? I'd guess that you are not, since you have Schindler's List jotted down.
Also, for those who list Vanilla Sky, you should check out the 1997 original, Abre los ojos by Alejandro Amenebar(who also directed The Sea Inside, The Others, and Thesis).
I think it is the better version, plus it's the original.
Not to hi-jack, but DeSica is absolutely right.
We've got some interesting conversations going in the 100 Films forums (click any link below) on benchmark motion pictures that are considered required viewing for new and established filmmakers alike.
I'd like to challenge anyone who predominantly favors films (by 50% or more) produced within the past twenty-five years in their Top 10 to participate in one or more of our 100 Films discussions.
There is a great deal that can be learned through the study of older pictures even as we all struggle to stay on top of the newest emerging techniques and technologies. Please add your voice to the conversation!
Cheers,
e
Not to hi-jack, but DeSica is absolutely right.
We've got some interesting conversations going in the 100 Films forums (click any link below) on benchmark motion pictures that are considered required viewing for new and established filmmakers alike.
I'd like to challenge anyone who predominantly favors films (by 50% or more) produced within the past twenty-five years in their Top 10 to participate in one or more of our 100 Films discussions.
There is a great deal that can be learned through the study of older pictures even as we all struggle to stay on top of the newest emerging techniques and technologies. Please add your voice to the conversation!
Cheers,
e
You make a good point with regards to some films, but I have never seen anything remotely close to surpassing 8 1/2, Lawrence of Arabia, Raging Bull, The Third Man, La Dolce Vita in context to what those film were doing. Maybe with a Citizen Kane, sure.
When making best of lists and talking about choices there are always going to be sweeping generalizations that kind of throw off focus.
Please give an example of how a movie has used similar techniques to the aforementioned films and done it better. I can't think of any. I think that is why they are so timeless and astonishing.
Not to say that the movies you have mentioned are not great, but the main reason why people say that they are the greatest is because they were the first. But being first should not automatically give them a spot in the top films of all time. It is a stepping stone from which most films of today can be traced back to (story, filming techniques), but if you take a look, you will see that many films of the past twenty years have met and surpassed the level of Citizen Kane.
It's my top pick. Words really can't describe how phenomenal this movie is. It's a modern day masterpiece.Hey Jg Marceaux
How do you rank Pan's on your list. I see you have it the top. I think cinematographers and editors alike, should study that movie.
This movie had me thinking about it for weeks afterward. This is the closest experience, cinematically, that you can have to reliving someone else's dream.Mulholland Drive, is definitely not a movie for everyone, but people either really like it or they don't at all.
It is hard for generations to appreciate the works before them if only due to lack of exposure I think.
Same here. Lots of my favourites are from during my lifetime.I'm a 70's baby, and most of my 'favortie ever's' are from the 70's - 90's and a bit O 00's
Exactly.I love cinema, period.
You can. Who said otherwise?why not like Tarkovsky and Spielberg ?
Not merely epic...timeless.And yes, Lawrence of Arabia and Raging Bull are epic.
For sure.That's why I hate TOP 10 lists; too short. : /
Dude, judging from the responses so far, it seems like most people haven't seen Kane....or The Bicycle Thieves, The Third Man, Lawrence Of Arabia, Raging Bull, La Dolce Vita, La Regle Du Jeu, 8 1/2, The Passion of Joan of Arc, and a whole bunch of other great films.
This thread could be the top ten films of last 12 years, or top ten films made during the 17 years you've been alive.
Don't be afraid to see Citizen Kane. Odds are a few of the directors you look up to consider it a masterpiece, and have found it influential. It isn't boring at all, nor is Casablanca...not if cinematography, mis en scene, and strong performances interest you.
You're not one of those people who eschews black and white films, are you? I'd guess that you are not, since you have Schindler's List jotted down.
I have watched Raging Bull about five times, but cant even recall a techique that was used that I have not seen before. Help me out here and tell me what specifically you are looking for.
Phil Maker,
Everyone is certainly going to have different tastes. But can you at least describe how Casablanca sucked? Why did it suck?