This is lengthy and may be full of stupid questions, but here we go. I worked at a TV station in the 90s as a camera operator on one of those news/talk/round table type of shows. Can't recall the brand or model, but the camera was one of those big, honkin' types on wheels with two large grips, hooded monitor, thick cables running out of it, etc. I was camera 2 of 3, and we would zoom in on the guests, focus, then zoom back out and stay that way for the duration of the show. (If there's a name for this type of focusing, I don't know what it is.) Supposedly, everything would be in focus after doing this, regardless of how many close-ups or full shots we'd do during the show.
Thinking about it now though, I would think if anyone was to walk in front of my camera after my having done this little trick, they should be out of focus. But the reasoning at the time was everything between my original focus point and my lens would be in focus. Never tested this.
Brings me to the present: If I do this trick now with the AF100 (filming ice skaters with me in a stationary point, while they go in circles) will I never need to use my lens' auto-focus feature? Presently, I use auto-focus. But if I happen to slightly move my camera off the skater, the auto-focus finds something behind them to focus on, thus blurring my skater. Any tips?
Thinking about it now though, I would think if anyone was to walk in front of my camera after my having done this little trick, they should be out of focus. But the reasoning at the time was everything between my original focus point and my lens would be in focus. Never tested this.
Brings me to the present: If I do this trick now with the AF100 (filming ice skaters with me in a stationary point, while they go in circles) will I never need to use my lens' auto-focus feature? Presently, I use auto-focus. But if I happen to slightly move my camera off the skater, the auto-focus finds something behind them to focus on, thus blurring my skater. Any tips?