Isn't this an exceptionally bad way to treat customers?
First Sony advertised the FS700 as a 4K ready camera that just needed a firmware upgrade, and then it turned out that the camera has to be sent to Sony for the upgrade. That creates problems, if you're using your camera for work. Fortunately I had jobs booked when the upgrade became available, otherwise I would've had to send it back to Sony for a second upgrade, since the first version has a bug. That in itself was a really bad move from Sony, to release a firmware with a bug, since it required sending the camera twice to get it fixed.
In October I got some free time, I contacted Sony but then I heard the upgrade would take two weeks (!) since they had a campaign for the upgrade to cost 250 € instead of 500 € during October and many cameras were being sent to them. I couldn't be without my camera for so long, so I waited. Last week I contacted them again and told them to pick up the camera. Then I got an answer where they said that the upgrade will no longer cost 250 €, which I already knew since it's no longer October. Instead of just picking up the camera, they delayed the process by sending me that e-mail so today I got to know that the camera might be away for two weeks, which I can't accept since I need it for work on December 1.
I think it's ridiculous that they don't have a different system where the customer can be in a queue and still have the camera available until shortly before the upgrade can be done. Then it could be sent away and returned in a matter of days. First of all they shouldn't advertise falsely, and if they mess up they should try to help their customers, not make them lose money. But no, Sony insist on dealing with their customers as if we should be grateful for giving them money in the first place. When I buy my next camera it probably won't be a Sony. Their service is awful.
First Sony advertised the FS700 as a 4K ready camera that just needed a firmware upgrade, and then it turned out that the camera has to be sent to Sony for the upgrade. That creates problems, if you're using your camera for work. Fortunately I had jobs booked when the upgrade became available, otherwise I would've had to send it back to Sony for a second upgrade, since the first version has a bug. That in itself was a really bad move from Sony, to release a firmware with a bug, since it required sending the camera twice to get it fixed.
In October I got some free time, I contacted Sony but then I heard the upgrade would take two weeks (!) since they had a campaign for the upgrade to cost 250 € instead of 500 € during October and many cameras were being sent to them. I couldn't be without my camera for so long, so I waited. Last week I contacted them again and told them to pick up the camera. Then I got an answer where they said that the upgrade will no longer cost 250 €, which I already knew since it's no longer October. Instead of just picking up the camera, they delayed the process by sending me that e-mail so today I got to know that the camera might be away for two weeks, which I can't accept since I need it for work on December 1.
I think it's ridiculous that they don't have a different system where the customer can be in a queue and still have the camera available until shortly before the upgrade can be done. Then it could be sent away and returned in a matter of days. First of all they shouldn't advertise falsely, and if they mess up they should try to help their customers, not make them lose money. But no, Sony insist on dealing with their customers as if we should be grateful for giving them money in the first place. When I buy my next camera it probably won't be a Sony. Their service is awful.