Dino
Veteran
Garion, you hit it on the head. For most of my work, thus far, the extra resolution isn't needed. I suspect the 500 would perform better in low light. The weight and size of the 500 is larger. One big advantage for the 500 is the much greater variety of lenses and 4 channels of audio. I know choosing the 500 over the 370 is going backwards in a lot of ways, but the 500 does have some distinct advantages. Ah decisions.
Grant
There is no substitute for the physics of sensor size, however, the 370 has pretty effective noise reduction to claw back lost sensitivity. The HPX500 highlight handling and noise levels are sub-par compared to the 370 and of course AVC-Intra 100 offers 4x color depth, full raster resolution, and Native frame rates in 1080. HPX500 is really just an HVX200 with 2/3" CCD's, so it's DSP is just as limited in processing power. Any of these cameras can look quite good in controlled contrast conditions, but the chroma clipping belies their DSP limitations. The 370 at 20-bits, while no HPX2700/3700 P2 Varicam with their 32-bit processor and Film-Rec, does seem to handle highlights better, ditto the HPX250, which is a 370 in a palmcorder wrapper.