.The Passion of the Christ

Re: .The Passion of the Christ

Well my wife and I with our 2 sons finally got the chance to see it this past friday night.

For me it was a very moving story about the last day Christ spent on earth. All that went into the making of this film was very believable and very gripping. I could pick-out various depictions of events that were fashioned so-to-speak to extenuate key points in Mel's (or someones) interpretation of these events, but none that in anyway lessened or changed in my mind what actually would have happened based on my understanding of the bible and history.

For my wife, it was all too real. About the time Christ was being beaten, she had to leave. She is so tender hearted, it was just more then she could bare up to.

My 2 sons and I sat and watched... Most of the time white knuckled while we empathized with some of the feelings and torment Christ had to go through. Very heart stirring -- wrenching really. I do appreciate Mel's willingness to put everything on the line in making this movie. I also appreciate his thoughtfulness and insight on how these events would have/could have play out. To me, he had to have a great amount of spiritual insight to bring to the screen so many key points and in a way that almost forced the audience into a decision about how The Son of Man (Christ) understood and accepted his preordained role he must play for all humanity.

For any who are sitting on the fence, you really need to consider seeing this picture. It is by far the best ever made to show the most important event in all history. Whether or not your can believe it is not the point, so much as it is what most of humanity has and will continue to believe. As this picture serves to portray these beliefs so well, everyone would have a much better understanding of why these beliefs exist and must continue to do so.

-Rodger
 
Re: .The Passion of the Christ

[quote author=Kyle Doris link=board=movies;num=1077923044;start=50#59 date=03/06/04 at 23:44:47]
i'm not sure if anything in the bible could be considered 100% historically accurate.[/quote]

You can't even say that about history books published last year.  History is a matter of perspective.  For every single person who witnessed an event, you will get a different story based on each person's perspective and how they saw the event unfold.  The bible, including the accounts of the life and death of Jesus could be called different people's accounts of the same event.  As a result, what it contains may be a different from what might be considered "historically accurate", but accuracy really only goes as far as what has been documented.  The bible stands alone as the most in-depth account of Jesus' passion-- therefore, it is the most historically accurate account of the focus of this film.

Regardless, this film is one of the most well done films that I've seen in a long time and IMHO this film should be seen with no other pretense than seeing a great piece of filmmaking.  What you choose to get out of it beyond that is up to you.
 
Re: .The Passion of the Christ

"You can't even say that about history books published last year."

yeah.. after all they are still claiming that europeans like columbus "discovered" the americas and the like, arent they.....?
 
Re: .The Passion of the Christ

Watched it the second time now and I see Gibson has realy woven a beautiful celuloid tapestry of scripture, tradition, meditations, emotions and historical events to depict the closest image of Jesus according to Matthew Mark Luke and John I have yet seen.

Dont miss out on the Mary / Jesus relationship, the Simon of Cyrene intervention and the tear of the Father. There is heaps to digest from any point of view. I suggset after watching it take some time off and let it soak in.

Great Job Mel & Jim !
 
Re: .The Passion of the Christ

I saw this film today with a work collegue. I'm in no way whatsoever a religious person, philisophical maybe but certainly not religious. Have never believed in God or in the teachings of Christianity and always thought of the Bible as just a rather odd book (like all religious texts). I hope I'm not offending anyone here, I respect everyone's right to believe what he or she wants to belive, diversity is what makes society interesting.

But anyway, so I approached my viewing of the film with a completely emptied and open mind. I though it was really very good! You don't have to be a Christian to enjoy (maybe not the right word here!) this fine piece of filmmaking and even after leaving the cinema, images from this film still play on my mind. Cinematography wise, it reminded me very much of the 'Lord of the Rings' trilogy, with lots of what looked like digital grading and over-use of slow-motion (no bad thing, just an observation). I guess both are mythological tales that are films more as "historical epics" among other things.

Anyway, yep, loved it. Ace film!! Avoided being pro-Christian propeganda and also all this talk of anti-semitism is utter SH*T!! 5/5
 
Re: .The Passion of the Christ

on 5:18pm on 26th Feb, Jubal28 wrote:
OK . . .

Even if it did blame it 100% on the Jewish population of one town 2,000 years ago, if it's historically accurate, how is that in any way condemnatory of an entire religion? (Haven't seen it, so I don't actually know what it does.)




biblicy accurate doesn't mean historically accurate. i don't mean to offend those of said religion, i too was raised RC... but as i have not yet seen this movie and don't really plan to, i'm not sure if anything in the bible could be considered 100% historically accurate.

That's probably why I wrote "historically accurate." :-*
 
Re: .The Passion of the Christ

If you have not seen this movie I encourage you to go see it this week. It is amazing that this event happened 2000 years ago and is still causing such a stir.

There was this man named Jesus who never murdered anyone and was put to death. Now Mel Gibson made a movie about Jesus's death. Now people are having major arguments and discussions about Jesus again.

Why John?
 
Re: .The Passion of the Christ

:D Kind of like when you're at an Xl1 showcase?

(My orginal take was really in bad taste so i reverted back to the easy one)
 
Re: .The Passion of the Christ

I finally got to see The Passion. It was really powerful.

P.S. that website...wow...Why are the thorns on your head now? Nobody noticed until you said something. My bad....Whatever. LMAO
 
Re: .The Passion of the Christ

[quote author=Jarred Land link=board=movies;num=1077923044;start=50#56 date=03/03/04 at 13:47:25]The opening shot was done by using a crane with a platform that the stedicam op actually stood on and started shooting, and then the crane came down and the stedicam steped off and followed Jesus.. all one fluid constant camera move. Brilliant.[/quote]

A similar but more complex technique was used in Kill Bill Vol.1. I do believe it involved at least two different cranes where the steadicam operator walked off one and then got into another and then finally walks off it as it lowers all the while keeping Uma Thurman in frame. The scene is in the House of Blue Leaves part, right before Uma spots Sophie in the bathroom when The 5,6,7,8's start Woo Hoo. Take a gander. ;)
 
Re: The Passion of the Christ

Re: The Passion of the Christ

Finally saw the movie this past weekend... yes, I know, only two months after most people saw it. I was very impressed and thought it was a very well done movie. It had some very powerful moments.

Now I did notice that the editing did not seem to be as well done as some of the higher priced movies like LOTR. I guess that would make sense considering how much more was spent on LOTR.
 
Re: .The Passion of the Christ

Yeah I thought the editting was actually done quite well. I really liked that raindrop shot when Jesus was on the cross as it started raining. That was awesome. Woah I sound like Chris Farley...
 
Back
Top