Teddy_Dem
Well-known member
Yes, I am liking these. I had asked if they were making any other mounts but I'm yet to get a response. I would like to see them in E-mount as well as several E-mount cameras have a Super 35 mode.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Quite liking that look. I used to hate 1.33x anamorphic, because they seemed so middle of the road, but as vintage glass has become so expensive, I think these 1.33x stretch lenses are a great way to reduced aggressive details and create a more homogenize image. And the fast aperture helps give that 2x anamorphic depth of field feeling, without getting into banana bokeh on the edges.
Yes, I'm with you on that as far as feeling like 1.33 does not give much of the "anamorphic feel" that people are looking for when they opt for anamorphic lenses. But the 1.8 aperture (on the 35, 50 & 75), the possibility of also adding oval inserts, and the super cheap cost for an anamorphic lens is enticing.
Yes, I am liking these. I had asked if they were making any other mounts but I'm yet to get a response. I would like to see them in E-mount as well as several E-mount cameras have a Super 35 mode.
I would be quite concerned using an anamorphic lens on anything other than a PL mount. Rotational accuracy is critical in anamorphic, as the squeeze & stretch will wreak havoc with the image is out of alignment. And many twist-lock lens mounts allow a slight bit of rotation even after the lens is seated, which is glaringly obvious in anamorphic when pulling focus or otherwise touching the lens.
I would be quite concerned using an anamorphic lens on anything other than a PL mount. Rotational accuracy is critical in anamorphic, as the squeeze & stretch will wreak havoc with the image is out of alignment. And many twist-lock lens mounts allow a slight bit of rotation even after the lens is seated, which is glaringly obvious in anamorphic when pulling focus or otherwise touching the lens.
The amount of new cinema lenses continues to grow.
DZO is proving to be quite prolific and is dominating the spherical "lens-scape"
A variety of full frame, and mirrorless anamorphic popping up in a low cost segment.
Atlas made an insanely wide 25mm 2x's, and they are rumored to be making a mirrorless lens soon
There are all kinds of mods, and detuning alterations available
Spherical entries are still popping up from al over. The price point for good spherical cinema glass is below $2K these days. Meanwhile, the high end remains expensive, and in some cases continues to rise. Vintage FF35 glass like Leica and Cooke continues to skyrocket in the vintage markets. But medium format and s35 remains somewhat stable. s16, s8, and 2/3" seems to remain cheap since the death/reduction of those formats.
Yeah, it’s crazy how in-demand “de-tuned” glass is. ~15 years ago, who would have though that there would be such a huge market that is fetching a pretty premium for older lenses that are soft and with flaws(but built as best as they could be, in their day) that had become almost worthless, for those reasons, and lenses intentionally designed to be soft and with “flaws”.
Outside of a specialty/one-off type shoot, I’d still rather have glass that is as clean and sharp as possible. I just bought the Canon 25-250 at the beginning of October and it is the cleanest, sharpest lens that I have ever owned. Even with the extender engaged, besides having to compensate for the exposure change, there is zero image degradation that I can see. I honestly forget I have it engaged the majority of the time, because there is no in-VF/camera indication like we have with ENG cameras when using the extender on ENG lenses. If I want to, sometimes I’ll throw an 1/8th HBM on in front of a lens, but that’s still pretty rare.
2/3” HD lenses are crazy cheap on the used market(I’ve been tempted many times over the last few years when I see the Fuji HA 23x pop-up for ~1/3rd of its price), but brand new, they are just as expensive as ever and even more so when you go to UHD lenses.
The amount of new cinema lenses continues to grow.
DZO is proving to be quite prolific and is dominating the spherical "lens-scape"
A variety of full frame, and mirrorless anamorphic popping up in a low cost segment.
Atlas made an insanely wide 25mm 2x's, and they are rumored to be making a mirrorless lens soon
There are all kinds of mods, and detuning alterations available
Spherical entries are still popping up from al over. The price point for good spherical cinema glass is below $2K these days. Meanwhile, the high end remains expensive, and in some cases continues to rise. Vintage FF35 glass like Leica and Cooke continues to skyrocket in the vintage markets. But medium format and s35 remains somewhat stable. s16, s8, and 2/3" seems to remain cheap since the death/reduction of those formats.
Outside of a specialty/one-off type shoot, I’d still rather have glass that is as clean and sharp as possible. .
I sort of feel like it's either or the other. Either you want a clean shot or you want an affected shot. But if you're shooting b-roll and hero shots, you could easily need both types of footage in the same shoot. My sony/sigma/tamron FE lenses, while probably not on par with your fancy ass glass in the coatings department, don't give me enough flare when flare is what I actually want
but then does that get in the way when you don't want flare and need to angle towards a light?
Do you charge extra to shoot with the lens or is it glued to your camera and more of a value add while charging the same rate?
I imagine that’d suck buying such a nice lens that you really enjoy but then not getting to use it regularly.
Have you been taking advantage of the extra reach? It must be so fast dialling in looks on multi cam shoots!? As well as providing so many framing options for those interviews where you change focal length in between questions etc.
The Samyangs are "Meister" not "Meistro". I haven't looked closely at them, but they could be nice if they follow in the footsteps of the Samyang XP photo lens series. The XP are more expensive than their regular offerings and achieve a more balanced performance with less glaring aberrations while maintaining some of that glossy look IMO. I really like the Samyang look although it's less of a one-size-fits-all than something sharper and more clinical