Hi all,
Did a test with a friends BMPCC and the Sony fs100. I shot the same rose at the same time using the Nikon 35mm G 1.8 lens on both cameras. The FS100 had the MTF adaptor and the BMPCC had the Speed Booster. Here are some specs...
Sony FS100:
White Balance 3200
24fps
1920x1080
Recorded to the internal AVCHD 4.2.0 codec
Picture Profile:
- G-LOG A 2.0 -
Black Level: 0 (set per scene)
Gamma: Standard
Black Gamma High, +7
Knee 105, 0
Color Mode: Pro +8 (was “Standard” before – typo, sorry)
Color Level: -3
Colorphase: -7
Colordepth: R -6, G +2, B +2, C -2, M +1, Y +2
WB Shift: LB-CC, 0, 0
Detail: Level -2, Manual off
BMPCC:
White Balance 3200
24fps
1920x1080
Recorded to the internal ProresHQ codec

Above is the end result of the BMPCC

Above is the end result of the Sony FS100
What I find interesting is that the Rose in the BMPCC photo has more detail. Able to see the veins. But the FS100 has more detail in the green leafs. Is 8bit 4.2.0. dead? Would love to hear your feedback. Thanks!
Did a test with a friends BMPCC and the Sony fs100. I shot the same rose at the same time using the Nikon 35mm G 1.8 lens on both cameras. The FS100 had the MTF adaptor and the BMPCC had the Speed Booster. Here are some specs...
Sony FS100:
White Balance 3200
24fps
1920x1080
Recorded to the internal AVCHD 4.2.0 codec
Picture Profile:
- G-LOG A 2.0 -
Black Level: 0 (set per scene)
Gamma: Standard
Black Gamma High, +7
Knee 105, 0
Color Mode: Pro +8 (was “Standard” before – typo, sorry)
Color Level: -3
Colorphase: -7
Colordepth: R -6, G +2, B +2, C -2, M +1, Y +2
WB Shift: LB-CC, 0, 0
Detail: Level -2, Manual off
BMPCC:
White Balance 3200
24fps
1920x1080
Recorded to the internal ProresHQ codec

Above is the end result of the BMPCC

Above is the end result of the Sony FS100
What I find interesting is that the Rose in the BMPCC photo has more detail. Able to see the veins. But the FS100 has more detail in the green leafs. Is 8bit 4.2.0. dead? Would love to hear your feedback. Thanks!
Attachments
Last edited: