Sony FX6 Firmware 2.0: Best Settings for Touch-Tracking Auto-Focus

Yeah, I would have to disagree, but only because it's 2022 and life and the industry has tremendously changed.

The older generation, including myself, will still follow that logic at times, which more or less could be absolutely rewarding in certain situations because you would expect someone who owns a $10K camera or a $10K tripod to know what he or she is doing, but the amount of talent that currently exists in this world who are slinging mirrorless' and creating masterpieces is endless.

Yeah, of course, many outbid far more talented individuals with absolutely the bare minimum who barely know the difference between shutter speed and white balance, but that's not only exclusive to video production and a part of a competitive existence.

Point is...if someone is hiring a person only because of the perception of their gear and nothing else, that is a really big problem, IMO.

That's just not how it is in my market. Literally just the other day I was on a shoot for a large company and the first thing the marketing director said was, "Man, finally someone with a real camera."

Maybe that's not your experience, but that happens all over and it's because of the insane number of people today claiming to be videographers because they bought a mirrorless camera. There are definitely people out there creating great content with them, and I myself use them, but there's also a million people who buy them who don't know what they are doing, but want to get into the industry because now they own a camera that can be "cinematic".

Photography is the same way. We have a term we use where I live called M-WACs (moms with a camera). There's probably over 1,000 "photographers" in my town who are literally that, moms who bought a camera, and now they offer photography. 95% of them don't know how to use lights so they market themselves as "natural light shooters", most of them don't understand what shutter speed or aperture means, and most of them just shoot to whatever their camera shot in out of the box and proceed to simply drop a preset on their photos in Lightroom and call it a day.

The issue with that is these M-WACs will often get a photo job because they tell everyone they know they are a photographer now, and when they show up and conditions are not ideal, or the camera is in a mode they don't know how to change out of because they don't know really anything about cameras, they will panic and end up doing a poor job. Photography is about so much more than owning a camera. It's about lighting, posing, interacting with the people you're photographing, lens choice, camera settings, and your ability to understand how to use the file in post, not to mention the overall business knowledge needed to do it right. Because of this, people will often get photos they are unhappy with and will have to redo their photos with another M-WAC in hopes that they are better.

How then is one supposed to weed through the junk that's out there and find people who are actually knowledgable about the craft and who are genuinely a professional? Is it based off of examples on a website? I think not because anyone can snap some nice pics every once in a while or make a cool highlight reel for video cut to fancy music. How do you sort through those people to find people who really know what they are doing?

An easy way when it comes to video is to see what gear you're using. If you're a marketing director of a business and you know nothing about video, but you do know that you need to have a project done and done well, you're likely going to see what kind of gear the person you're looking to hire is using in their pics on their website, social sites, etc. And if you see them using a photo camera, but another guy you're looking at has a cinema camera, you will likely call the guy with the cinema camera. He might be worse at filming, but he has a tool that looks more like what is expected.

Even guys like me who know what to look for in people will still do this. If I hire someone, I want to know what kind of gear they have and what experience they have. If they have a RED V-RAPTOR and a cheap Manfrotto tripod, then I know where their priorities were. That tells me a lot about that person. But if they have a Sachtler Video 18 and an old C300, then that tells me they have a good understanding of what's important. As such I'm more likely to hire the second guy.
 
Last edited:
For me, I don't care which camera someone is using if it's completely fine for what we are doing.
How people use them is much more critical, how they use their brains.

Yes. When I'm teaching a workshop I can instantly jump to a ton of conclusions about an attendee the second I see them setup a light stand or open a tripod. So much is revealed in those little things.
 
That's just now how it is in my market. Literally just the other day I was on a shoot for a large company and the first thing the marketing director said was, "Man, finally someone with a real camera."

Maybe that's not your experience, but that happens all over and it's because of the insane number of people today claiming to be videographers because they bought a mirrorless camera. There are definitely people out there creating great content with them, and I myself use them, but there's also a million people who buy them who don't know what they are doing, but want to get into the industry because now they own a camera that can be "cinematic".

Photography is the same way. We have a term we use where I live called M-WACs (moms with a camera). There's probably over 1,000 "photographers" in my town who are literally that, moms who bought a camera, and now they offer photography. 95% of them don't know how to use lights so they market themselves as "natural light shooters", most of them don't understand what shutter speed or aperture means, and most of them just shoot to whatever their camera shot in out of the box and proceed to simply drop a preset on their photos in Lightroom and call it a day.

The issue with that is these M-WACs will often get a photo job because they tell everyone they know they are a photographer now, and when they show up and conditions are not ideal, or the camera is in a mode they don't know how to change out of because they don't know really anything about cameras, they will panic and end up doing a poor job. Photography is about so much more than owning a camera. It's about lighting, posing, interacting with the people you're photographing, lens choice, camera settings, and your ability to understand how to use the file in post, not to mention the overall business knowledge needed to do it right. Because of this, people will often get photos they are unhappy with and will have to redo their photos with another M-WAC in hopes that they are better.

How then is one supposed to weed through the junk that's out there and find people who are actually knowledgable about the craft and who are genuinely a professional? Is it based off of examples on a website? I think not because anyone can snap some nice pics every once in a while or make a cool highlight reel for video cut to fancy music. How do you sort through those people to find people who really know what they are doing?

An easy way when it comes to video is to see what gear you're using. If you're a marketing director of a business and you know nothing about video, but you do know that you need to have a project done and done well, you're likely going to see what kind of gear the person you're looking to hire is using in their pics on their website, social sites, etc. And if you see them using a photo camera, but another guy you're looking at has a cinema camera, you will likely call the guy with the cinema camera. He might be worse at filming, but he has a tool that looks more like what is expected.

Even guys like me who know what to look for in people will still do this. If I hire someone, I want to know what kind of gear they have and what experience they have. If they have a RED V-RAPTOR and a cheap Manfrotto tripod, then I know where their priorities were. That tells me a lot about that person. But if they have a Sachtler Video 18 and an old C300, then that tells me they have a good understanding of what's important. As such I'm more likely to hire the second guy.

M-WACs took some of my business over the years!

Still really think it depends. Can't make nonsensical decisions based on gear. Like what if the production doesn't require a tripod? You're going to dismiss an 8K V-RAPTOR because the other guy/gal has a Sachtler tripod with a 1080p camera? Have to be somewhat reasonable as well, don't you think?

Once there was a discussion on this forum about people pretending to have certain cameras to get jobs - which I 100% did myself (and we just rented them) - and some people went as far as creating websites with fake pictures and gear.

You sound like you would make hiring decisions based on trust, which is amazing - and actually an important quality in itself - but there is almost no way to ever know how good the person you are hiring is - no matter the gear - unless you really, really know from a very highly-respected reference, or you're straightforwardly hiring someone who has a world-class resume to back it up...not like a highlight reel, but like a Hollywood movie.
 
Yes. When I'm teaching a workshop I can instantly jump to a ton of conclusions about an attendee the second I see them setup a light stand or open a tripod. So much is revealed in those little things.

How's that A1 of yours, BTW? Did you ever post anything from it on the forum? (I was going to ask the other week.)
 
You sound like you would make hiring decisions based on trust, which is amazing - and actually an important quality in itself - but there is almost no way to ever know how good the person you are hiring is - no matter the gear - unless you really, really know from a very highly-respected reference, or you're straightforwardly hiring someone who has a world-class resume to back it up...not like a highlight reel, but like a Hollywood movie.

I do 100% agree with this. You're completely right in that there is really no way to ever truly know how good a person is that you're hiring unless like you said, they have a highly-respected reference. I totally agree with that. And again, like I said previously, there are certainly amazing camera ops out there who are rocking mirrorless cameras who are much more talented than me. I'll be the first to say that.

My whole point is that depending on the industry, if you're wanting to get into commercial, corporate, events shooting, etc., buying a more proper video camera (or cinema camera, whatever you want to call it) can in many cases go a long way in helping you look more like someone who knows what they are doing. It's not fool proof by any means, but it's one way to help differentiate yourself from others and when someone is looking to hire you and they don't have that highly-respected reference, all they can do is make a decision based on what they see. And if what they see if you holding a big F55 (that you quietly picked up for $4K on eBay) and they see that you own and use that camera, they are likely to feel a little more confident in their decision to hire you than Bob down the street with his A7III.

Anyway, I want to point out that I'm just giving you my experiences and you might have very different experiences than me. Also, you make very valid points and I agree with a lot of them. This is overall a great conversation and I'm glad we can have it.
 
How's that A1 of yours, BTW? Did you ever post anything from it on the forum? (I was going to ask the other week.)

Good question. It is absolutely fabulous for shooting 50 megapixel stills @ 30 RAW images per second with incredible auto-focusing. I don't care what you are trying to shoot, if you can manage to keep it in the frame, the camera will focus on it. It used to be I'd fire off a burst when shooting birds in flight and hope that one or two might be in focus (Canon 5DMIV), now I actually have to spend time sorting through dozens of contenders that all look good enough. It is an amazing machine.

So what about for video? I have no idea. I've been too busy this spring to even think about shooting video with the A1. One of these days I'll get around to it though . . .
 
I love my A1 so much I that I’m in the process of replacing my A7SIII with a second one. It’s the most incredible stills camera I’ve ever touched and for video it matches my FX6 remarkably well, but with the added benefit of Super35 4K and 8K. Just an amazing machine.
 
Back
Top