drboffa
Well-known member
I finally got around to putting together some comparison footage I shot months ago of the FX6 and the FS5. This was just looking at exposure latitude. Not the most scientific of tests, but I did use the same model lens and tried to make it as close a comparison as possible. The FS5 automatically suffers due to the limitations of the internal codec, but that's also the reality of how I mostly use both these cameras (internal HD in the FS5; internal UHD in the FX6).
The FS5 holds up pretty well so long as it's getting enough light, but it absolutely falls apart when it's underexposed and you're trying to bring the image back (especially compared to the FX6).
The FS5 holds up pretty well so long as it's getting enough light, but it absolutely falls apart when it's underexposed and you're trying to bring the image back (especially compared to the FX6).