Eric Coughlin
Veteran
Kind of curious what people's thoughts are on batteries (assuming you're not using V-mount, as I most likely wouldn't want the bulk). For my two C100's I have three Canon batteries (about 5 hours each) and four off-brand batteries (about 4 hours each), which gives me 31 hours (or 15.5 each, though I'm typically not running the second camera constantly) of batteries for just an additional $272 in spending. A lot of my shoots range from 10-16 hours in a day and I like not having to charge batteries in the field if I don't have to. The FS7 comes with one Sony BP-U30 which gets one hour of battery. To get 15 hours of battery with the Sony BPU90 ($425 for three hours) that would be $2150, or Sony BPU60 ($270 for two hours) $1890.
Going off-brand, Amazon has these BP-U60 for $50 each, which would be $350 for about 15 hours if they gave the same amount of run time as the Sony branded ones, and these for $110 each which would be $550 going off of the same assumption. Then Switronix, Ikan, and Watson also offer various options priced in-between.
Compared to the GH4 shooting 4k or the C300 as a 12k camera, I'm finding the FS7 to be a bit pricey in terms of the cost of on-brand batteries in ratio to the cost of the camera. We're talking a 19 watt power draw on the FS7 vs. 5.6 watts on the FS700.
Also, the FS7 brochure states, "Power Consumption Approx. 19W (while recording XAVC-I QFHD 59.94P, SELP28135G Lens, Viewfinder ON, not using external device)," so I'm curious to how the power draw would be different when not recording at those specifications, such as recording at 1080 24p and powering different lenses than that one.
Going off-brand, Amazon has these BP-U60 for $50 each, which would be $350 for about 15 hours if they gave the same amount of run time as the Sony branded ones, and these for $110 each which would be $550 going off of the same assumption. Then Switronix, Ikan, and Watson also offer various options priced in-between.
Compared to the GH4 shooting 4k or the C300 as a 12k camera, I'm finding the FS7 to be a bit pricey in terms of the cost of on-brand batteries in ratio to the cost of the camera. We're talking a 19 watt power draw on the FS7 vs. 5.6 watts on the FS700.
Also, the FS7 brochure states, "Power Consumption Approx. 19W (while recording XAVC-I QFHD 59.94P, SELP28135G Lens, Viewfinder ON, not using external device)," so I'm curious to how the power draw would be different when not recording at those specifications, such as recording at 1080 24p and powering different lenses than that one.
Last edited: