Sony f35 with odyssey 7q - ongoing experiences and evolutions

TheWakePlace.com

Well-known member
So i know that there is an extensive thread on the F35, and i wanted to not distract from it too much and made this thread to show our ongoing experiences with the F35 and Odyssey 7Q settings.....

Here is what we did: We are a production house that has been Red Epic/Scarlet/Red One based for a couple of years. When Red announced the Motion Mount and the Global Shutter, we got excited! After purchasing them and using them, i personally fell out of love with the image and just didn't feel that i was getting anything out of these cameras that were such an investment. Not wanting to get too deep into that whole story, but i have sold my own personal Red, and purchased a very clean and low hours F35 from a LA company who had one that is pratically new.

Why Now: If it wasnt for the Odyssey 7Q, we would be singing a differnt song here. To have an OLED monitor, with low power drain, light and robust, from a company you can actually talk to and get a response out of, has been fantastic. Can't rate Convergent Designs high enough. The unit is amazing, and you're just going to have to trust me on that one until i can get video up.

What You Should Know

My Setup:
I am using the following set up on the F35 in terms of power and lenses etc...
- F35 Body with PL mount
- Zeiss Superspeed PL lenses
- IF Box on the back with Switchtronix plate for V-mount
- Zacuto harware all around with Otto Nemenz cheese plates
- Odyssey 7Q powered by custom P-Tap cable
- Cartoni Focus Head
- Genus Elite MB with Schneider ND

F35: The Camera That Got Lost...

Firstly, this camera can see more than my Red, i know as i have them next to each other right now looking at the same scene. The F35 also handles low light in a nicer way, and highlights are just the best out of anything digital that i have seen. This camera can see what my eye can, in the same way. It really makes it such a solid connection between user and camera in terms of looking at your scene. Anyone who tells you that "yeah but it doesn't shoot raw" has no idea what they're talking about in terms of production workflows. If you need to shoot raw to make nice images, then you need to buy a light meter and go back to film school - in addition if you need to work in RAW, then you would never have been able to work with real film :) This camera can be treated like working with film in terms of ISO rating, Dynamic Range and highlight clipping.

Out Of The Box, What Will The 7Q Do?

From the IF box the camera can record:

- 10Bit 4:4:4 24P
- 10Bit 4:2:2 60P, 50P, 29.97P

From the Monitor Out ports on the side of the camera:

- 10Bit 4:2:2 24P - i havent tested any other frame rates yet from here as we are mainly interested in the 4:4:4 output.

Dual Link

To get the 4:4:4, you will have to use the IF box and you will need to Dual Link into the 7Q. The Odyssey is pretty amazing as it will auto-detect the feed. If you change the settings on the camera via the LCD panel on the side or the assist panel, the 7Q changes its pick up instantly and you're good to go! You do need 2 HD-SDI cables going into the unit to do this, only from the IF box. Dual out from the onboard built in HD-SDI will not give you these 4:4:4 files, and it will actually confuse the 7Q if you dual link from both of the monitoring ports.

sLog

If you want the 10Bit 4:4:4 files, then be prepared to use the 7Q's amazing focus peaking features. Because you are feeding out of the IF box, you are seeing the sLog feed on the monitor, NOT a LUT version like you can through the EVF or the monitoring HD-SDI ports on the side of the camera. Be prepared to take these files into Resolve or any other professional grading suite. Built in coloring in Premiere, Magic Bullet or Colorista just doesn't cut it for us with these files.

Card Space

This is a valid note here, you will need some SSD's to get the most out of the camera. We are filling up 256GB cards very fast, like less than 30mins of footage fast. Thats considerably higher than shooting at RedCode 6:1, a common compression to use on a Red for commercial projects for us. The USB3 SSD connector is VERY FAST at downloading the cards, they are very very fast SSD's. I would suggest that you budget for 2x512GB SSD's.

Post Production - Davinci Resolve

We are round tripping from Premiere CC, to Resolve and back again. After you import the image stacks into Premiere as an image sequence, do your edit, you export as an XML - all normal so far. In Resolve, if you try to link clips to your XML in Resolve 9 or 9.1, it will not connect to them. You will need to have Resolve 10 to make this happen. Make sure you are working with Resolve 10 or 10 Lite to work with these 10Bit DPX files in the normal workflow method.

Future Codecs

It has been mentioned that there will be ProRes and other compressed formats coming for the 7Q, which will then open up the F35 to a whole host of fast workflows. There will also, i darn well hope, be a 12Bit 4:4:4 codec to come too - allowing the full potential of the camera to be realised.


Thats it for now, i will be adding video a whole load of Demos soon. I will also be showing how we are building this camera for run and gun using some Zacuto gear. Hope this was informative for some....

 
Thanks for the writeup wakeplace! Have you tried quad-link (both the monitor and IF ports) into the camera for 4:4:4 50p/60p? Also any luck with 12-bit output? (or is the 7Q not able to recorder 12-bit files at the moment?)
 
Grug, havent tried quad, but i will tonight.

The other info is all in my post on the 12bit.

Anyone know how to change your screen name on here?
 
Nice write up. I too am interested to see how you have chosen to configure your rig.

The Odyssey7Q does not currently support 12-bit video capture, but it is on our roadmap. The Canon C500 can also output 12-bit 4:4:4 RGB HD, so we have at least two major camera models we can support with this feature.

When we enable custom LUT creation, one will be able to create LUTs in a program such as Resolve and import them to the Odyssey7Q for monitoring a "corrected" image. This should improve your on set workflow, and you can always switch out of the LUT in order to view the available range in SLog.

And yes, compressed recording is on the way.

Glad to hear this is working out well for you.
 
That seems excessive for the Quad link, not saying it isnt the case, but it doesnt make sense to me that a company like Sony would not put 444 capable out puts on the actual camera itself.

So today my Mattebox and filters come, and then i have a complete rig. When its all together, maybe this afternoon, i will show how i am putting this all together and how its configured. Plus i will also try to get some footage up by the end of the weekend. Its Sundance week for us, so its a busy one...
 
Got my Odyssey the other day. Will be shooting some test footage today. So far, so good. Dual link into it works, shows up as 444. However, Odyssey is only doing 10-bit at this time. :(

Despite the web site and feature list, no Vectorscope either. (big bummer to me). No audio metering of any kind.
Both are alleged to be coming in a future firmware release.
 
Got my Odyssey the other day. Will be shooting some test footage today. So far, so good. Dual link into it works, shows up as 444. However, Odyssey is only doing 10-bit at this time. :(

Despite the web site and feature list, no Vectorscope either. (big bummer to me). No audio metering of any kind.
Both are alleged to be coming in a future firmware release.

When they finally deliver a unit that records prores/dnxhd I'll jump and buy one.
 
Got my Odyssey the other day. Will be shooting some test footage today. So far, so good. Dual link into it works, shows up as 444. However, Odyssey is only doing 10-bit at this time. :(

Despite the web site and feature list, no Vectorscope either. (big bummer to me). No audio metering of any kind.
Both are alleged to be coming in a future firmware release.

The feature list also claims only 10bit 422 up to 60p on base 7Q. Apparently for 10bit 444 we need to purchase the "Sony" upgrade.
Can you confirm this? Jon said he is getting 444 but not sure if he got the "Sony" upgrade?

I'll also jump on the 7Q bandwagon as soon as compressed codecs become available.
 
That seems excessive for the Quad link, not saying it isnt the case, but it doesnt make sense to me that a company like Sony would not put 444 capable out puts on the actual camera itself.

Well, quad link is only necessary for 4:4:4 at frame rates higher than 30P. Under that you can get all you need from the dual link.

As for outputs, the camera has a LOT of outputs on it already, a lot more than Panavision ever put on the Genesis, but you have to bear in mind Sony didn't envision us using the cameras like we are now. They envisioned people docking stuff to it, like the HDCAM SR deck or the Codex recorder.

Sony were meant to bring out their own solid state recorder which would dock on the camera and give us all the features of the SR deck but on SR cards, however I think they decided there wasn't demand for it. It was going to be called the SR-R3 I believe.
 
It's interesting because the F35 has the 6G capable output, via dual interface box, that 4k requires. I wonder if it would be as easy as a firmware update, or does the averaging required to fill the 4k pixels require additional hardware. If only sony had a reason to keep the F35 up to date.

I was looking at some 4k TV's at the Sony store, I bet 12 bit HD would look wonderful on a 4k screen. Instead of using the bigger sized blu-ray discs to fit highly compressed 4k material, uncompressed HD would probably look better. I still wish we had a way to sneak in there and get the 5k raw files.
 
Did some preliminary testing with the F35 and the 7Q seems to recognize it, etc.
It's only 10-bit "for now". Will try to do a 60P test next.
The imagery is awesome, though. DPX's sure rock.
 
The way Sony/Panavision engineered the F35's sensor you are only ever going to get 1080P out of it. Damn fine, glorious 1080p, but 1080p nonetheless. Even if you did get "4K" out of it, that somewhat defeats all the arguments behind the F35 being "only" 1080P.

Basically the F65 is kinda what you're talking about - the actual number of pixels on the vertical is identical to the F35, but they are laid out in a totally different way.

A lot of people on here don't have much love for the F65. Personally, I don't have any issue with it - I'd happily swap my F35 for one, but I don't think it is the great leap it seems to be on paper.
 
Back
Top