I've had a bit of a play with the 'film modes' (bit of an odd name given it also relates to the stills.) and by no means conclusive but I was finding that Smooth appears to compress the bottom end a bit.
I shot the same scene locked off, same exposure and viewed on wave form, and Standard appeared to be slightly flatter across the board (opposite of what I was expecting.)
Standard did appear to let me see into the shadows a little more ...
Iris seemed to be half-stop down on Smooth for same waveform according to exposure metering in-camera.
I'm wondering if the film modes affect on the image is more to do with the primaries than the gamma response.
Turning contrast up +1,+2 definitely compresses the blacks though.
I would like to get to the bottom of sharpness and NR, as boosted sharpness looks fine on screens below 42" but when blown up on my 1080p projector some edges show aliasing.
I shot the same scene locked off, same exposure and viewed on wave form, and Standard appeared to be slightly flatter across the board (opposite of what I was expecting.)
Standard did appear to let me see into the shadows a little more ...
Iris seemed to be half-stop down on Smooth for same waveform according to exposure metering in-camera.
I'm wondering if the film modes affect on the image is more to do with the primaries than the gamma response.
Turning contrast up +1,+2 definitely compresses the blacks though.
I would like to get to the bottom of sharpness and NR, as boosted sharpness looks fine on screens below 42" but when blown up on my 1080p projector some edges show aliasing.