Denniscasey
Well-known member
With thanks to patient coaching from this forum regarding my ongoing efforts to improve my videos of race cars, I am wondering why I don't see a very noticeable change in the motion "look" I get when I shoot at different shutter speeds. Applied to video I think I understand that if each frame has some blur (slower shutter speed) the human eye uses that to "smooth" frame to frame movement. If each frame is very sharp (fast shutter speed) human eye can give a strobing look to frame to frame movement. I have also watched You Tube and similar video "teaching" about shutter speed, but my internet speed I think affects way video looks.
When I critically viewed video from last race car event I shot at 1/60 I thought there was too much blur. Going to another race September 7 so did following experiment today which I thought would define upper limits to shutter speed I could use and still get normal motion look:
Went to nearby highway, stood about 20 feet back at right angles to cars passing at around 55 miles per hour. Background was wooded area. Filmed cars as they came towards me, selected a car and panned with it as it crossed in front of me (had set zoom so car almost filled frame as it passed in front of me then did not touch zoom), and continued panning with car as it drove away. That is typical shot angle/pan I get at races. Selected 720 60P format; put camera on manual setting (but left exposure and focus on default auto setting for simplicity); and then varied shutter speed; 1/60; 1/120; 1/250; 1/500 and 1/1000. Viewed experiment results on 46 inch HD TV with SD card inserted in Panasonic Blu-ray player.
I have to say the overall motion effect looked quite similar and "normal" even at 1/1000 (no noticeable stuttering or jerky motion) for all shutter speeds greater than 1/60 (which still had some blurring). In fact I wondered if camera was really using shutter speeds I selected but there are differences in exposure settings camera chose which I monitored at each shutter speed; sharpness of cars when I pause player (blurred at 1/60, progressively sharper at faster shutter speeds) and wheels turn forwards at some shutter speeds and "backwards" at other shutter speeds (which could be considered to give abnormal look, but it is overall look I am interested in); background blurs more with panning at slower shutter speeds, etc. I will continue some experimenting at race next week, but most of that footage needs to be "good." So, my questions are:
1. Did all my reading and theory just cause me to expect a more dramatic difference than I saw? Are differences just subtle ones?
2. Were cars just moving too slowly (55 mph) to create very noticeable difference among shutter speeds?
3. Do some Blu-ray players have software/hardware that "smooths" motion when it detects a stuttering condition so it "normalized" motion effect among all the shutter speed settings? Doubtful, but had to ask.
4. Was my particular shooting/panning angle one that led to minor changes in look as I changed shutter speed?
5. Or something else going on?
Thanks in advance for any comments that would help me with this, Dennis
When I critically viewed video from last race car event I shot at 1/60 I thought there was too much blur. Going to another race September 7 so did following experiment today which I thought would define upper limits to shutter speed I could use and still get normal motion look:
Went to nearby highway, stood about 20 feet back at right angles to cars passing at around 55 miles per hour. Background was wooded area. Filmed cars as they came towards me, selected a car and panned with it as it crossed in front of me (had set zoom so car almost filled frame as it passed in front of me then did not touch zoom), and continued panning with car as it drove away. That is typical shot angle/pan I get at races. Selected 720 60P format; put camera on manual setting (but left exposure and focus on default auto setting for simplicity); and then varied shutter speed; 1/60; 1/120; 1/250; 1/500 and 1/1000. Viewed experiment results on 46 inch HD TV with SD card inserted in Panasonic Blu-ray player.
I have to say the overall motion effect looked quite similar and "normal" even at 1/1000 (no noticeable stuttering or jerky motion) for all shutter speeds greater than 1/60 (which still had some blurring). In fact I wondered if camera was really using shutter speeds I selected but there are differences in exposure settings camera chose which I monitored at each shutter speed; sharpness of cars when I pause player (blurred at 1/60, progressively sharper at faster shutter speeds) and wheels turn forwards at some shutter speeds and "backwards" at other shutter speeds (which could be considered to give abnormal look, but it is overall look I am interested in); background blurs more with panning at slower shutter speeds, etc. I will continue some experimenting at race next week, but most of that footage needs to be "good." So, my questions are:
1. Did all my reading and theory just cause me to expect a more dramatic difference than I saw? Are differences just subtle ones?
2. Were cars just moving too slowly (55 mph) to create very noticeable difference among shutter speeds?
3. Do some Blu-ray players have software/hardware that "smooths" motion when it detects a stuttering condition so it "normalized" motion effect among all the shutter speed settings? Doubtful, but had to ask.
4. Was my particular shooting/panning angle one that led to minor changes in look as I changed shutter speed?
5. Or something else going on?
Thanks in advance for any comments that would help me with this, Dennis