A client is engaging me a series of stylish/illustrated interviews re their org for internet distribution. At least two of the initial ones lend themselves to gliding/steadicam moves, eg interviewee on a long walk through moorland.
Consequently I'm thinking of pushing the button on a brushless gimbal system. But there's a couple of options open to me based on kit and the overall (envisaged) shooting scenarios. I mostly shoot on an FS5 and a couple of Nikon D5300 DSLR's, so they are:
1) The one handed vertical stick gimbal route with a DSLR on top/bottom. The pros are the whole set up will be a lot smaller allowing shots in confined spaces, which I anticipate there will be a lot of through the series. Also the cost ranges from £800-1000.
2) Get something wider/bigger to handle the FS5, like a Ronin/Letus Helix. But the cons here are price, weight and size.
So the obvious choice is go the smaller stick route. So tell me why I shouldn't?
Consequently I'm thinking of pushing the button on a brushless gimbal system. But there's a couple of options open to me based on kit and the overall (envisaged) shooting scenarios. I mostly shoot on an FS5 and a couple of Nikon D5300 DSLR's, so they are:
1) The one handed vertical stick gimbal route with a DSLR on top/bottom. The pros are the whole set up will be a lot smaller allowing shots in confined spaces, which I anticipate there will be a lot of through the series. Also the cost ranges from £800-1000.
2) Get something wider/bigger to handle the FS5, like a Ronin/Letus Helix. But the cons here are price, weight and size.
So the obvious choice is go the smaller stick route. So tell me why I shouldn't?