GH5 Science of IR-Cut, and practical implication? [Barry? Thomas? Mitch?]

filmguy123

Veteran
After some reading and research, I've realized The GH4 had an OLPF. I was aware the GH5 removed this, *BUT* I was under the impression it only affected moire/sharpness. This also removes the IR filter which the GH4 had, thus basically making the GH5 a "full spectrum" camera. The GH4 was not, which explains why I have suddenly started having these issues that I have never previously had (dramatic color shifts/tints with Fader NDs in bright sunlight). Minor before, major now.

So my questions are as follows:

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(QUESTION 1)

Wherever you land on the infamous UV Filter / No UV Filter debate, I have equipped all of my lenses with UV Filters. Can I simply replace all my UV filters with these UV + IR Filters, and then simply continue to use my Standard VND filters as I always have?

https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/857393-REG/Hoya_A77UVIR_77_mm_UV_and.html

Would this *hurt* anything to pop the same lens with this UV+IR filter attached onto any camera (including GH4, EVA-1, etc.)? Any problems doubling a UV-IR cut filter on a camera that already has an IR-cut inbuilt?

How about stacking these with another filter that has IR-Cut (ie, a UV+IR Cut Filter affixed to each lens, and then at the end of the pipeline via XUME adapter adding on a Variable IRND?

How about all three? (Camera with an OLPF/IR-Cut... then a UV/IR filter on the lens... then a Variable IRND fader or static IRND filter?)

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(QUESTION 2)

Does adding an IR filter onto the GH5 or any other full spectrum camera improve IQ at all on merit of it blocking invisible light, even if not being used in conjunction with ND exposure control? Could it ever hurt it?

Does it make sense to place a permanent IR filter on the camera for any use use case, even if an ND is not needed (indoor shots, outdoor lower light shots, etc.), to make up for the loss of the OLPF that the GH4/EVA-1 has?


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(QUESTION 3)

My understanding is that it's fine to stack IR/UV/ND filters, in any order, UNLESS using a hot mirror IR filter, in which case that *must* be the outermost layer otherwise you can have trouble with ghosting. Is the Hoya UV-IR Filter that so many recommend as the best a Hot Mirror, or can it go anywhere in the pipeline?

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

NERDY "SCIENCE-Y" QUESTIONS ;)

4.) Why does the infrared light spectrum operate in REVERSE of the Kelvin temperature scale? Red is the hottest, blue is the coolest in Infrared. Yet in Kelvin, we see that Orange/red light is the coolest (indoor tungsten) and blue light (outdoor sunlight) is the strongest/hottest/warmest. When Herschel did his experiment measuring temperature, blue light from the sun measured cooler than red light.

5.) I am trying to figure out why my standard, no IR block, VND did not cause issues overseas in Papau New Guinea (where it was bright and sunny). One thought: most of the reflected/absorbed IR spectrum was cooler (blue in IR) due to the dirt and jungle and foliage VS here in the States, I am shooting against concrete, etc. which may absorbing much more heat energy and reflecting back as orange/red in the IR spectrum? Thus, making the problem far more noticeable and causing observable color shifts and tints? Or perhaps the high humidity?

6.) Also trying to figure out why my standard ND filter has not caused problems in overcast weather, such as here in PNW or in Alaska. Will the affect that a non-IR blocking VND gives off be stronger on hot sunny days VS overcast or cool days? I imagine so, because based on my previous theory, if true, it seems that the cooler blue IR light pollution is not nearly as problematic as the stronger/hot “red” IR light pollution? Or perhaps this is merely a factor of how intensely the VND is blocking light; ie when a VND is used past 1.2 for example, the infrared pollution may increase more and more and this doesn't happen in more shaded or overcast settings?

------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Thank you for the help in understanding this new rabbit hole of a topic!
 
Last edited:
Ive read the the gh5 does 300mbs - I like that.

I've held it in my hand and quite liked it.

It has occurred to me that it could be great.

A little comment about delayed hdmi and now this reminds me that an fs5 or Eva will just probably be cheaper and better.

Inbuilt Nd is tuned by the manufacturers top geeks.. Probably well worth paying for!
 
At risk of pulling us off topic (really want to keep it on topic, as I really want to learn this topic (+ practical gear needs) I will just interject that my love for the GH5 has not diminished even with this. Everything in imaging and workflow is a compromise. Yes, it's one more to deal with and figure out, but there are some things that the GH5 has made possible for me workflow and creativity wise that I am very grateful for and that simply cannot be replicated in any other system on market today. But that's another topic!

Anyway... back to geeky IR facts and filters! I do hope this thread will be informative for others running into this, as I have seen virtually NILL on this topic online as it relates to the GH5 vs the GH4. And as I've learned the hard way, it is VERY important to truly understand this (science wise + gear wise) to get the image right consistently...

Resume! ;)
 
This seems like a pretty key issue. Surprised not to see any help after a week! Does anyone know the answer to this, or are we all as lost on these questions?

I can't seem to find a whole lot of concrete info on this online, let alone an understanding of some of the specific questions outlined above.

Barry Green - any chance you know the answer to this one??
 
Just because the GH5 lacks an OLPF does not mean it lacks a IR Cut.

If the GH5 lacked IR protection there'd be a 100+ page thread on the topic, so believe your issues lay elsewhere.
 
Ill chip in more random thoughts.

My main 'ND hell' was the (ND Less) Sony FS100 with was extremely sensitive with a base ISO of 500 or 800 or something.. right when I got booked to shoot hotels in the Portugese mid summer.

Basically a 6stopND and a VND was required. (that is three sheets of glass in front of the front element)

Result? Casts, softness, ghosting, internal reflections.. desire to throw the camera into the pool.

I think you can read all you want and theorise all you want but I can tell you stacking glass in bright light just does bad sh_it unless every filter element is top end, perfectly clean and fully flagged like you would see on a cinema matte box set up.

When light hits a filter the light that is not required has to 'go somewhere'.. it is reflected back out from the camera.. or back into the other filter it just came from and then back to the filter that is trying to filter it out. Chaos.

Your concept of stacking filters, yada yada just sounds like no shot will match the next shot.

--

Would this *hurt* anything to pop the same lens with this UV+IR filter attached onto any camera (including GH4, EVA-1, etc.)? Any problems doubling a UV-IR cut filter on a camera that already has an IR-cut inbuilt?

As for doubling ones IR cut.. well consider this.. A filter is a physical thing not a computer algorithm - a computer understands a command like 'make any value above 90,000 zero'.. a filter is dyed or has a chemical applied (oddly Ive seen them do it in a factory https://youtu.be/GgDKW8vQV0M?t=25s) now if this chemical is not quite right I guess it will knock out some deep red.. now you stand to double filter your deep reds (now if you shoot under LED - very short of Deep red) you will doubtless start to have colour shifts.

Lack of deep red in a skin tone is a really bad thing because people start to look ill.

Does adding an IR filter onto the GH5 or any other full spectrum camera improve IQ at all on merit of it blocking invisible light, even if not being used in conjunction with ND exposure control? Could it ever hurt it?


Yep scrabbling around for any photons and any contrast ratio in dark/high iso situations is doubtless going to not be helped by adding glass and cutting some deep reds.

(If you observe some of the really high ISO cameras one can start to see IR leak at high ISO.. manufacs are clearly skating a fine line between 'pollution' and grabbing every useful photon)


This seems like a pretty key issue. Surprised not to see any help after a week!


The GH5 is brand new. I guess people are not really digging into real life shooting situations yet. You might be ahead of the field.
 
Last edited:
The GH5 is brand new. I guess people are not really digging into real life shooting situations yet. You might be ahead of the field.

I've never had any IR issues with any of my GHx cameras including the GH5, but I replaced my ND filters with IRND filters just to play it safe. ( I really don't want to see any surprises in post )

The Tiffen VIRND filter looks tempting, especially if it can retain neutral color through it's ND range.
 
Just because the GH5 lacks an OLPF does not mean it lacks a IR Cut.

If the GH5 lacked IR protection there'd be a 100+ page thread on the topic

As for doubling ones IR cut.. well consider this.. now you stand to double filter your deep reds (now if you shoot under LED - very short of Deep red) you will doubtless start to have colour shifts.

Lack of deep red in a skin tone is a really bad thing because people start to look ill.

I've never had any IR issues with any of my GHx cameras including the GH5, but I replaced my ND filters with IRND filters just to play it safe. ( I really don't want to see any surprises in post )

So if the GH5 does have an IR cut filter, then using IR-NDs or a UV-IR Cut filter would be BAD... right?
 
------------------------------------------------------------------------------

NERDY "SCIENCE-Y" QUESTIONS ;)

4.) Why does the infrared light spectrum operate in REVERSE of the Kelvin temperature scale? Red is the hottest, blue is the coolest in Infrared. Yet in Kelvin, we see that Orange/red light is the coolest (indoor tungsten) and blue light (outdoor sunlight) is the strongest/hottest/warmest. When Herschel did his experiment measuring temperature, blue light from the sun measured cooler than red light.

5.) I am trying to figure out why my standard, no IR block, VND did not cause issues overseas in Papau New Guinea (where it was bright and sunny). One thought: most of the reflected/absorbed IR spectrum was cooler (blue in IR) due to the dirt and jungle and foliage VS here in the States, I am shooting against concrete, etc. which may absorbing much more heat energy and reflecting back as orange/red in the IR spectrum? Thus, making the problem far more noticeable and causing observable color shifts and tints? Or perhaps the high humidity?

6.) Also trying to figure out why my standard ND filter has not caused problems in overcast weather, such as here in PNW or in Alaska. Will the affect that a non-IR blocking VND gives off be stronger on hot sunny days VS overcast or cool days? I imagine so, because based on my previous theory, if true, it seems that the cooler blue IR light pollution is not nearly as problematic as the stronger/hot “red” IR light pollution? Or perhaps this is merely a factor of how intensely the VND is blocking light; ie when a VND is used past 1.2 for example, the infrared pollution may increase more and more and this doesn't happen in more shaded or overcast settings?

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Any science geniuses here know the answer to any of these ones? Still curious the mechanics of this on a science / "why" level :)
 
The Kelvin scale is about the colour of a heated block of metal

At 3000 degrees kelvin it will be red hot - and 6000 almost "white hot"

The aim of a camera is to make a grey card grey - so under 3000k light you have to boost the blue channel.

This leads to a "reversing" of the numbers

The boost could be called anything it's just a nomanclature that has developed.

---

As for your other situations - science is complex in the real world.

250ac actually might be 245 on a busy day. A transparent filter actually only transmits 98% of light. 15mm rods are 15.01 or 14.95

A scientist who understands the complexity of the real world can't really therefore comment on your situations without recreating them.

Your concept of humidity cloud cover etc are probably not far off the mark
 
Back
Top