ethan cooper
Well-known member
I fully agree that there is still a place for 2/3", but the problem is Red has built it's brand around out specing the other guy. If Canon has indeed caught up & will be offering large sensor 4k for sub $20K then I can't see Red putting a 2/3 incher out there due to their bravado & pride.
I'll go one step further & speculate that the fixed lens Scarlet is no longer. I have nothing to base that on other than the problems they were having sourcing parts after the tsunami. I keep thinking there will be one $12Kish scarlet brain with a mount that will accept Red branded interchangeable lenses that act like traditional ENG video lenses (the idea behind the fixed Scarlet anyway) and will also adapt to cinema/still lenses.
I think that after the success of Epic that Red is less inclined to play in the sub $10K market. I'd love to be wrong & 3K for $3K to be alive and kicking but I just don't see it.
To quote Jim Jannard
I'll go one step further & speculate that the fixed lens Scarlet is no longer. I have nothing to base that on other than the problems they were having sourcing parts after the tsunami. I keep thinking there will be one $12Kish scarlet brain with a mount that will accept Red branded interchangeable lenses that act like traditional ENG video lenses (the idea behind the fixed Scarlet anyway) and will also adapt to cinema/still lenses.
I think that after the success of Epic that Red is less inclined to play in the sub $10K market. I'd love to be wrong & 3K for $3K to be alive and kicking but I just don't see it.
To quote Jim Jannard
I think you can assume it applies to everything we have in the works. Our competition has responded to where they think we are going. That changed a long time ago.![]()
Last edited: