ectobuilder
Veteran
Re: FS100 vs DSLR (for artistic use)
Hey Guys,
I've been a huge supporter of the FS100. However recently I invested in some lighting (LED) for the first time (I normally do run and gun events with no external lighting).
With the lighting, I shot with BOTH the FS100 and my DSLR. And wow was there a difference in usability and user interface.
You see, up until now, I've always preferred my FS100 (to my DSLR) because of it's splendid low light capability. BUT, with proper lighting, the DSLR really kicked the FS100's butt in terms of giving full artistic freedom to adjust exposure and white balance on the fly (used magic lantern for white balance, very easy to get to). Accessing these features on the DSLR is so much more quicker and easier than it was on the FS100.
I love the dedicated ISO button and dial wheel of the DSLR, whereas the FS100 (as you all know) has a three-stage gain switch on the side and to dial in the gain in 1db increments you must go into the menu (yuck).
By having such easy access to such features, it allowed me FULL CONTROL and ARTISTIC FREEDOM over my lenses and artistic composition of the scene. Yes the FS100 allows for exposure adjustments as well, it's just more awkward and slow to get to.
So my question is this, given my situation should I be selling my FS100 (assuming if I am content with staying away from very low light shoots)?
I've reasoned that in order to get great low light out of the FS100, you need to shoot with a wide open aperture anyways, meaning I am forced to shoot with a shallow depth of field (not something I want to do all the time), so that defeats my purpose of wanting to shoot like a free artist (I should have full control over selective depth of field), meaning I would have to "pick my fights" and shoot with proper lighting only, hence using DSLR's.
Hey Guys,
I've been a huge supporter of the FS100. However recently I invested in some lighting (LED) for the first time (I normally do run and gun events with no external lighting).
With the lighting, I shot with BOTH the FS100 and my DSLR. And wow was there a difference in usability and user interface.
You see, up until now, I've always preferred my FS100 (to my DSLR) because of it's splendid low light capability. BUT, with proper lighting, the DSLR really kicked the FS100's butt in terms of giving full artistic freedom to adjust exposure and white balance on the fly (used magic lantern for white balance, very easy to get to). Accessing these features on the DSLR is so much more quicker and easier than it was on the FS100.
I love the dedicated ISO button and dial wheel of the DSLR, whereas the FS100 (as you all know) has a three-stage gain switch on the side and to dial in the gain in 1db increments you must go into the menu (yuck).
By having such easy access to such features, it allowed me FULL CONTROL and ARTISTIC FREEDOM over my lenses and artistic composition of the scene. Yes the FS100 allows for exposure adjustments as well, it's just more awkward and slow to get to.
So my question is this, given my situation should I be selling my FS100 (assuming if I am content with staying away from very low light shoots)?
I've reasoned that in order to get great low light out of the FS100, you need to shoot with a wide open aperture anyways, meaning I am forced to shoot with a shallow depth of field (not something I want to do all the time), so that defeats my purpose of wanting to shoot like a free artist (I should have full control over selective depth of field), meaning I would have to "pick my fights" and shoot with proper lighting only, hence using DSLR's.