Bart_Boge
Well-known member
The QuickStream site says their device can handle DVCPRO formats. Does this mean, with a firmware update, that it might be able to handle DVCPROHD100? Might it then be another "until the P2 prices drop from the stratosphere" option? And an option for event videographers who need an hour of runtime or more? What kind of recording times would we see from QuickStream's 60GB version @ DVCPROHD100?
I don't know if the drives they use in their enclosures would be fast enough. FW400 itself is fast, but that is not where the bottleneck is with FW drives anyway, is it? Even if it were, FW800 would be complete overkill for DVCPROHD100 anyway, and not too hard to engineer into a new version of the QuickStream.
And have they resolved all of their QC issues? Not that more won't surface at much higher data rate recording formats. Since the doomsday warnings a year ago, I haven't heard much about MCE's hd-recording contender. Their reputation was trashed--but have they turned the corner yet? I think I could be quite forgiving if the thing was reliable!
I don't know if the drives they use in their enclosures would be fast enough. FW400 itself is fast, but that is not where the bottleneck is with FW drives anyway, is it? Even if it were, FW800 would be complete overkill for DVCPROHD100 anyway, and not too hard to engineer into a new version of the QuickStream.
And have they resolved all of their QC issues? Not that more won't surface at much higher data rate recording formats. Since the doomsday warnings a year ago, I haven't heard much about MCE's hd-recording contender. Their reputation was trashed--but have they turned the corner yet? I think I could be quite forgiving if the thing was reliable!