GrumpyDiver
Member
Has anyone used the Lumix 100-300mm lens on the AF100? It’s fairly inexpensive and has the upper end of the range I am looking for. I don’t see it as one of the “recommended” lenses so I assume that there will be limited if any camera / lens integration if I do get it. I am looking at it as one of a possible solution for an upcoming 4-5 day trip to Etosha National Park in Namibia to video the animals at the water holes there. I'll be in Namibia for just over 3 weeks, but Etosha is likely the place I will be doing extremely long shots. I’m trying to pack fairly lightly (long trip to Namibia so I am going to carry as little as I can get away with).
I will be using my long Nikon lenses (80-400 Nikon and 150-500 Sigma) on the still cameras, and all my other two Nikon lenses (70-200mm and 55-200mm) are a bit short to use. I can’t see buying another Nikon lens, as I already have the range covered. It’s a bit of a dusty environment, so whatever I put on the camera has to stay on, as I am not planning to do any field changes. Any lens changes will occur in “cleaner” conditions after I have cleaned up the gear after a day’s shooting.
Any thoughts on this lens or alternative suggestions?
I will be using my long Nikon lenses (80-400 Nikon and 150-500 Sigma) on the still cameras, and all my other two Nikon lenses (70-200mm and 55-200mm) are a bit short to use. I can’t see buying another Nikon lens, as I already have the range covered. It’s a bit of a dusty environment, so whatever I put on the camera has to stay on, as I am not planning to do any field changes. Any lens changes will occur in “cleaner” conditions after I have cleaned up the gear after a day’s shooting.
Any thoughts on this lens or alternative suggestions?