Ianscreations
Well-known member
Since the GH5 uses Contrast-Detect Autofocus, would it make sense that shooting in a shallow depth of field would help the camera target better?
Back when the autofocus debate raged forward, I was doing my own test with my (very patient) son.
https://vimeo.com/213089607/2559480acb
I deliberately shot against a background with a lot of contrast and used the most shallow depth of field to really push the limits of the autofocus abilities.
But in the real world, I usually shoot wedding processionals with a deeper depth of field to give myself more range to keep the subject within focus.
But I started wondering...would it actually help the camera to focus if I used a more shallow DOF? Not sure where the "contrast detection" actually works. To me, there is greater contrast between a subject with a shallow depth of field than a subject in a deep depth of field.
Thoughts on that?
Back when the autofocus debate raged forward, I was doing my own test with my (very patient) son.
https://vimeo.com/213089607/2559480acb
I deliberately shot against a background with a lot of contrast and used the most shallow depth of field to really push the limits of the autofocus abilities.
But in the real world, I usually shoot wedding processionals with a deeper depth of field to give myself more range to keep the subject within focus.
But I started wondering...would it actually help the camera to focus if I used a more shallow DOF? Not sure where the "contrast detection" actually works. To me, there is greater contrast between a subject with a shallow depth of field than a subject in a deep depth of field.
Thoughts on that?