John Froton
Well-known member
I realize that 24 fps has an inherint stutter that reveals itself with camera movements and pans that are done quickly. I see the same stutter on the big screen in theaters during some pans and have noticed the same on some panning on TV as well.
My question is about the general cadence in shows on TV shot with 35mm film, like CSI, NCIS etc. Is the cadence, or temporal resolution, of these shows set at 24 fps and is the same inherint stutter in these shows that is in the HVX shooting 720 24pn? I realize that camera movement must be slow and consistant to avoid stutter but it seems that these shows shot on 35mm film look so smooth with quick action and relatively quick camera movements taking place.
I also realize that shutter angle and degree play a part in motion blur and that more blur reduces stutter to a degree. However, I guess my bottom line question is, is it strictly a matter of moving and panning the camera as the 35mm film guys do? Or is there more to it than that in order to get the same look as 35mm (aside from lighting and shallow depth of field)?
My question is about the general cadence in shows on TV shot with 35mm film, like CSI, NCIS etc. Is the cadence, or temporal resolution, of these shows set at 24 fps and is the same inherint stutter in these shows that is in the HVX shooting 720 24pn? I realize that camera movement must be slow and consistant to avoid stutter but it seems that these shows shot on 35mm film look so smooth with quick action and relatively quick camera movements taking place.
I also realize that shutter angle and degree play a part in motion blur and that more blur reduces stutter to a degree. However, I guess my bottom line question is, is it strictly a matter of moving and panning the camera as the 35mm film guys do? Or is there more to it than that in order to get the same look as 35mm (aside from lighting and shallow depth of field)?