Olaf99
Active member
Yeah, this gets into a bigger issue that I think most people (the bottom 99% of the nation) have trouble reconciling. They'll rush out to the theatre to see a movie because Brad Pitt is in it, and then turn around and complain that he's making so much money. Or they'll give all of their retirement funds to someone to invest in Citigroup which pays the CEO millions of dollars, but then ***** when the CEO gets paid mass moolah.
If you don't think Brad Pitt should make millions of dollars, don't see his movies. If you don't think Brian Urlacher should make millions of dollars, don't buy his jersey. If you don't think the CEO of Citi should be getting 100 million dollar bonuses -- don't invest in Citi.
Most of the top 1% are there because we support them being there.
Again, though, to this topic -- it really does sound like the right people got the correct percentage. The director, honestly, should have gotten even more because it was his equipment that was used in the shoot! And, I mean, let's face it, 90% of the time the guy walking away with the most money is going to have the title Producer. If you wanted to make more money off of this you should have been a producer. They paid you 15 bucks an hour for what was, I'm assuming, a pretty good time with your friends. You and your brother should be waving your cash saying, "Hey! We have 500 bucks to invest in the next project!" THIS will get you on the bill as a producer, see?
You and your brother should know that friends and creative collaborators are oft times irreplacable. You can't do the business of making films alone. You need people aroung you. Some are going to be concerned about the money, some are going to be concerned about the artistry. You need both. Go back and make amends with these guys and move onto the next project. You guys won! You should be focused on the next project -- putting these winnings into the next project -- not bickering.
I agree with this totally. It does suck that you had different expectations about the dollar amount though. In my experience making shorts I provide cameras, tripods, makeup, props, location (in most cases), pizza, beer, lighting. My duties include writing the script, storyboarding, directing, shooting, lighting (except hauling stuff around and plugging it all in), editing, and music.
If the guys who haul the lights, did two sound effects, and applied the makeup want to get more of the prize money than I offer them they can take a flying leap. I entered a contest with a $5000 prize (didn't win) and figured on giving everyone 10%. If they want to argue I'll list how much money I spent in the last two years for equipment:
-DVX 100b
-iMac
-Final Cut
-Fluid Head Tripod
-DOF adapter
-Polarizing lens
-Lights lights and more lights
-Special effects makeup and contact lenses
-etc etc
There's just no way they can compete since we're all amateurs and I've spent $6-7 K on this black hole they call independent film making.