Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
7) On your budget, there is no better lens than the Tamron 28-75mm F2.8, which you can buy for $300-350. It offers performance comparable to the Canon 24-70mm L. Some photographers actually prefer it to the L because of the extremely close performance at a fraction of the price. For a telephoto zoom, the best budget option is the Tokina 80-200mm F2.8, which is also comparable to L-series glass. It can also be bought used for $300-350 for the non-Pro version. (Note: The non-Pro version's front element rotates when you pull focus.) Both these zooms are about as sharp as primes. The only reason why you'd want to have primes in addition to them is if you find particular lenses that are faster, offer better color and/or contrast, offer better bokeh, and/or focus a lot closer. On your budget, these might not be important benefits to have, so the money could be better spent on other equipment.
I don't believe that they do, but again, you can't expect it on something that only costs $300-350.Do either of those lenses have image stabilization, you know?
This was my first EOS lens. It's a very sharp and high performance glass, about the same as the L series. Just two comments on it..there is no better lens than the Tamron 28-75mm F2.8, which you can buy for $300-350.
I don't believe that they do, but again, you can't expect it on something that only costs $300-350.
what for? thought you were gonna sell up. you're not flip flopping are you kholi? I can't understand why you'd be selling it unless you need some cash. but I suppose if you have a red and a GH1 the MKII might not be necessary.
If you want my MKii, give it a week and I'll be selling it more than likely with my CF Cards etc for about the price of a new camera without all of that.
I just don't like it as a video acquisition tool, personally, but the image is awesome. I don't know if it's the lack of 24P, the Jello, the Fixed LCD annoyance or what but I just can't get into this camera.
Anyway, there you go.
Wow guys. I really appreciate all of these responses. Thanks to Kholi for that super in depth response. I do think that different cams are for different people, and the lcd thing is what I am most worried about to be honest. How easy would it have been to put it on a swivel? I mean come on canon! All the wiring would have been the same and everything.
Please link me to any possibilities as far as small lcds go. Do they need HDMI ports?
One possible solution I was thinking of is basically based around mirrors. Using mirrors and optics, low angle shots should be very doable, and you will still be taking advantage of the original resolution. The basic method would be placing a mirror at a 45 degree angle from the monitor to be able to see what the monitor is seeing. This is actually GREAT and simple as far as focuing, however, your image will be upside down. I don't suppose there is a way to flip the LCD image while recording is there?
So, what would be the best way to optically flip the image? How do the flip modules on 35mm adaptors work? I feel like this could really work. I've been playing around with mirror setups on a point and shoot still I have and I think this could work. I found some ways to flip it, but I am sure there is a specific optic, or setup that is used. A magnifier would also be very helpful. Honestly I think this has a lot of potential. Can anyone post some methods of optically flipping images? There has to be a method...
Thanks for all of the input.
Not true. The HDMI-out works, but the output signal, while recording, is VGA resolution (640x480). Composite is 480i. My option is still the best value, if you care about resolution.I am dissapointed to hear that there is no HD out while recording though. So it's only composite that works while you record?
The Tamron is an autofocus lens. The autofocus is slow and noisy. But it's the best that you'll find for your budget. Sigma makes a comparable zoom lens (that you can find in used condition for a similar price) that might have a better AF motor, but the downside is that its filter diameter is a whopping 82mm. It's a much heavier/bulkier lens also. The Tamron has been known to have AF accuracy issues. But most users don't have any major complaints about the AF.I was wondering, do those lenses you listed have autofocus in the still mode? And if not, would this be more expensive?
As far as your mirror idea goes, you could always just mount the camera upside-down and flip the recorded video in post.
Search this:
Ikan 2.5" LCD (Spec-Comm)
Noga Arm (Heavy Duty might be best)
Hoodman for 2.5" LCD OR one of those EyePieces From Zacuto or Redrock
Composite Out
Small Battery Back (two rechargeables will do)
350.00 to 400 at the most.
It'll solve the Viewfinder issue and you get full range as far as versatility goes.