FS7: Premiere multicam question

LennyLevy

Veteran
This may be the wrong place to post but it doesn't look like many people frequent the editing forums here so:

How powerful a computer do I need to cut 4 4k cameras multicamera in current premiere ?

I have an imac 4 cores, i7 single processor , 3.5 ghz , 32 Gs ram , Nvidia gtx 780M graphics card w 4G VRAM - (cud )

probably cut a mix of FS7 and A7sii cams,.
Will that work ?
 
Give it a try. I suspect it's on the cusp, but not unreasonable. Or better yet, just convert to proxies, do your cut and then link back to the full rez files to finish.

Ned
 
I can do it - BUT - the sources cannot be own the same hard drive. Perhaps an SSD could do it, but my usual drives can't. With a couple on the fastest drive and one each on separate drives it works fine - with just the occasional stutter on my pretty fast editor.
 
+1 on having Premiere Pro generate proxies on import.
Will save you a lot of aggravation.
Premiere automatically goes back to work with the original (full res) files when you render/output your cut.
(Only issue would be if you are in a time crunch and need to go directly into the edit without having enough time to generate proxies. In this case definitely use multiple SSDs for your source material)
 
Thanks a lot. I haven't cut much in a couple of years and was previously on FCP7 so this will be a maiden journey of me on Premiere and with 4K . Proxy certainly sounds like a good idea.
One of my main questions was whether it makes a difference for multicam to spread my sources out one a few drives or just it put it all on one RAID or SSD? I'm guessing Paul ( above ) is right to spread it out.

About 6 years ago I had surprisingly good luck running 5 or HD cameras in a multicam on FCP7 with a laptop, and that time I spread my sources out among 3 ESATA drives.

So if I go with Proxy files do I still want to use a RAID or SSD's or will I be OK with USB3 or ordinary ESata drives?
 
Just noticed I can get Sansung 860 EVO 1 TB drives for only $167 on Amazon . Maybe a pair of those would be all I need. I won't have more than an hour of footage .
 
Get a pair of the Samsung drives in a dual-drive enclosure and RAID with DiskUtility. That would be very fast.
 
+1 on chat about drives - they're the significant data bottleneck. I forked out for a G-Studio Thunderbolt 2 24Tb tower plus iMac 5K last year and they're OK - but still not what I expect as an editor.

Multiple streams? I'd definitely do proxies.

Ben.
 
Thanks a lot for all your help again everyone. I still don't even have a lock on this but as i'm new to Premiere and editing 4K and in a multicam there's a lot to think out first. Seems to be falling into place though and looking forward to it.

I would definitely do proxies, but wondering if I still need SSD's . I'm figuring yes to getting a pair of 1T SSD's (USB 3) but not raiding them. Wondering also if I shoot Log would the additional weight of using LUTS slow down the multicam. If so I'm thinking I could burn in the LUT for the proxies and go back to the original log for final?
 
Wondering also if I shoot Log would the additional weight of using LUTS slow down the multicam. If so I'm thinking I could burn in the LUT for the proxies and go back to the original log for final?

Yes - totally. It's my biggest bugbear with PP - LUTs slow it down to near uselessness.

Add a basic grade to the proxies and you shouldn't need SSDs, if you use a lightweight proxy like ProRes LT. Decent high speed spinning disks should do the trick.

By the way, my first "proper" music concert edit in 1994 - for a UK band called Take That - involved initially cutting telecined proxies on LoBand Umatic, generating an EDL from that with the VITC and conforming the next stage of proxies with 2 second handles in Lightworks on super-expensive 2 Gigabyte drives. Final conform was done as a neg cut and then mastered on Digi Beta.

Nothing's really changed in 24 years... stuff gets faster, then the files just get bigger. And then you get LUTs...

Ben.
 
Back
Top