Mine are
Indoors / low light
Gamma: Cine1
Black level: 0
Black Gamma: Middle, 0
Knee: 90, Slope: +2
Color Mode: Pro, Level: 8
Color Level: 0 to -2. I might switch it back to 0 as it's pretty desaturated already.
Detail: -4
The rest is default
Outdoors / high contrast
Gamma: Cine 4
Black Level: +4
Black Gamma: Middle, +4
Knee: 90, Slope: +2
Color Mode: Pro, Level 8
Color Level: -2
Detail: -4
The rest is default.
At first I, loved how Cinegamma 1 sees into the shadows and was my favorite PP as it has this old school look. I didn't like the default values for Cinegamma 4 because it was more contrasty and over-saturated. With my tweaks above, the shadow detail seems a bit better and it looks kind of like Cinegamma 1, but with better highlights.
After a tons of pixel peeping tests though, Cinegamma 1 is much better than Cinegamma 4 in low light because there is way less blocking in the shadows.
I really wanted to like Cinegamma 3 after reading Art Adams article on Dynamic Range because Cine 3 has 12 useable stops (the most in the FS700). Cine 3 seems like it's somewhere between Cine 1 (great shadow details) and Cine 4 (great highlights), but I could not get it to where I liked the look. The blacks never felt right, but on paper Cinegamma 3 has the most DR.
http://provideocoalition.com/aadams/story/cameras_sony_fs700_dynamic_range_presentation/
Anyways, what Profiles do you guys like?
Indoors / low light
Gamma: Cine1
Black level: 0
Black Gamma: Middle, 0
Knee: 90, Slope: +2
Color Mode: Pro, Level: 8
Color Level: 0 to -2. I might switch it back to 0 as it's pretty desaturated already.
Detail: -4
The rest is default
Outdoors / high contrast
Gamma: Cine 4
Black Level: +4
Black Gamma: Middle, +4
Knee: 90, Slope: +2
Color Mode: Pro, Level 8
Color Level: -2
Detail: -4
The rest is default.
At first I, loved how Cinegamma 1 sees into the shadows and was my favorite PP as it has this old school look. I didn't like the default values for Cinegamma 4 because it was more contrasty and over-saturated. With my tweaks above, the shadow detail seems a bit better and it looks kind of like Cinegamma 1, but with better highlights.
After a tons of pixel peeping tests though, Cinegamma 1 is much better than Cinegamma 4 in low light because there is way less blocking in the shadows.
I really wanted to like Cinegamma 3 after reading Art Adams article on Dynamic Range because Cine 3 has 12 useable stops (the most in the FS700). Cine 3 seems like it's somewhere between Cine 1 (great shadow details) and Cine 4 (great highlights), but I could not get it to where I liked the look. The blacks never felt right, but on paper Cinegamma 3 has the most DR.
http://provideocoalition.com/aadams/story/cameras_sony_fs700_dynamic_range_presentation/
Anyways, what Profiles do you guys like?
Last edited: