Pixelpeeping Vincent

Status
Not open for further replies.
ando said:
you think?

to me it's the jello that makes the moon move.
Click to expand...


Let me look again.

But the cam was mounted on the car so it will move too.


The only moon movement that I thought was weird was the time lapse with herky jerkey near the end. It keep changing exposure and moving a bit spazy like the camera wasn't locked down or was getting bumped.
 
Isaac_Brody said:
Not sure why one would obsess frame by frame over this video. The footage looks very good for Canon's first baby step into the DSLR hybrid market. I think this camera will do pretty well. If I were getting a new DSLR I would seriously consider this one.
Click to expand...


Canon's next camcorder will be killer.


Watch.


Cannon is not as dumb as they have been.


They will make a Camcorder that takes Canon 35mm glass.

It will have a hyped full size chip to boot that records to open market solid state.


Bet Money!
 
utako.o said:
OUCH.. are you predicting that RED one's will soon be curiosity peices?
how long did the company last: 2 years, 3 max?


;)
Click to expand...

Only if there is a suitcase of cocain somewhere in the equation. ;-)

Red just needs to really go for the jugular. It's a simple marketing axiom: Offer more quality product than the other guys for less. It works everytime. People will flock. It will be a lower profit margin (maybe even very, very slim), but they'll make it up on volume. The most critical thing at this juncture especially at that price point is to build "Brand". You do that by selling quality at a bargain price. Then "Brand" recognition and volume sales go through the roof.

If they don't offer a full size sensor to get that major bokeh in order to protect their Red One. Good bye, Scarlett. I'm sure they'll press along with the Red One, but they won't be as big as they could have been. This is about winning the market, not protecting Red One. It strikes me that Jannard is all about winning no matter what the cost. That's a good attitude to have when you go up against Nikon and Canon.
 
Last edited:
Ando - you have an open invitation to come to my studio at any time (business hours) for pretty much ever. You can inspect the RAW footage yourself and see that nothing whatsoever was done to it. Period. I turned the camera on... then off. Imported into FCP, cut , added music - and exported via compressor. End of story.

It's one thing to question me publicly - I don't mind. But calling me a liar... is another thing. I know it's RAW footage and that only one result came possibly come of this.. to that end - start crafting your apology letter...
 
to be clear - this is vincent laforet - the guy who shot the 5D MKII "reverie" video - who you are calling a liar and I shot the footage that you are spending an inordinate waste of time dissecting - and pontificating on...
 
Mr. Laforet you did a great job. Congratulations. You made NYC look beautiful one more time. Don't worry about a few nutcases in here. They really don't count. Keep up the good work.
 
Mr. Laforet, thanks for popping in and setting the record straight.

And thank you for also shooting a great little piece showing off the camera's potential.

And Ando I suggest you apologize to Laforet.
 
I think Ando works for Red. LOL

Vincent Welcome! Great video and great photos. Please communicate up to Canon that 24P would be much desirable!
 
The Sarlacc said:
Originally Posted by booggerg2
Actually, Red doesn't stand a chance.. Look at what happened to Scarlet..

And which of your assholes are you attempting to pull this from?
Click to expand...

It's obvious that with the 5D2 and what's to come in the future for Canon's pro-sumer camcorder line, Scarlet 1.0 as it was design will not stand a chance with the competition in year 2xxx of when it is finally released. 2.0 could compete, but then it is still a just an imaginary camera with an ever chance spec sheet as demonstrated by Red so far.

ando said:
:D



the same right below the white center line
Click to expand...

OMG you people are truly messed up. You know out of 21MPs there will bound to be some that are hot/dead or whatever. I have 3 Canon DSLRs and they all show several hot pixels in the frame when shooting at high ISO or long exposure. Do I care? no...
 
Dear Laforet, I am your big fan, and I am very disappoint with some people here, just let you know many people know you in New Zealand, and they like your works a lot.and many people using your name everywhere. In China, I have post many biggest form as well. just let you, everyone in China loves your work. and please keep up those. I don't know why many people againest Canon , now turn this to you. You really shouldn't worry this kind S**. they just can't help themself.
 
Hey Mr. Laforet,

Great film! Thanks for showing what the 5d is capable of. The fact that footage is raw and unprocessed is just astounding. Thanks again. Nice job.

I hope my results are just as good when I turn my 5D on and then off.
 
All this dumping on Ando. Poor guy. I liked his dissection. It was an interesting read. As for the fake? Who knows, it is the internet after all. That's why dissections and discussion are good. They help prove truth or BS.

I found the hot pixels and the jellocam most interesting. I'd be choked if I had a hot pixel in my camera. Don't get me wrong, I'd love to mess around with this camera, but people need to take a deep breath. It's going to have limitations, just like everything else out there.
 
why is everyone so aggresive? wasn't me who said 5d is better than $100. don't look at me
no on should feel sorry for no one. it's just a forum. if someone thinks i'm crazy please ignore me. if the moderator thinks i'm bad for the forum let me know and i'll keep stuff just for myself.

here's your blended frames. this behaviour isn't present in every scene. the man running on stairs doens't show blended frames for example

1 - sharp
2 - blend
3 - sharp





 
Ando, Laforet offered you an invitation to go look at the original footage. You're basing your observations on footage shrunk to a quarter of its original size and further compressed. You can't be sure of what you're seeing because you don't have the original footage in front of you. And to go to this level of dissection seems a little strange. I'm not sure if you have something against the camera or Laforet himself.

As Vincent already stated.

laforet said:
Ando - you have an open invitation to come to my studio at any time (business hours) for pretty much ever. You can inspect the RAW footage yourself and see that nothing whatsoever was done to it. Period. I turned the camera on... then off. Imported into FCP, cut , added music - and exported via compressor. End of story.
Click to expand...

What you've said in this thread and in another thread can be construed as libel and you need to be careful about that. If you want to approach Laforet personally and ask him questions contact him on his blog or email him directly. No more dissection posts please.

Also, keep in mind that this is a pre-release camera. It's not the final version, there may be some funky image things going on that have nothing to do with Laforet. It's probably a better idea to hold any major judgments and dissections for a production model. When it's released in a few months rent one and check it out for yourself.

I don't think there's anything too productive here in this thread so I'm gonna shut it down. If you want to keep discussing this camera there's at least two other threads.

Thanks.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top