Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He chose to, to thumb his nose at the hollywood system. And the result was his most dismal, horribly-reviewed box office disaster. And everyone, even the biggest XL1 fans, have to admit that the film looked horrible..
Old and inefficient.Barry in relation to mjpeg can you expand on lousy? Do you mean because it's inefficient or aesthetically speaking?
Hah! Excellent! And netflix has it on blu-ray too... I'm tempted just to relive the glory. But even on a 67" set, it's not gonna be blown up quite like it was from six rows into the theater.btw, anybody get 28 Days Later on Blu-ray? That's the way to see it.![]()
I don't think I'd try shooting a $100,000 movie on a GH-1.
Old and inefficient.
.
My understanding is that he intentionally uglied it up.That had absolutely nothing to do with camera. Not one pixel.
It can certainly affect it. Most certainly it can. To put it in reverse -- seeing a film in Imax can absolutely impact the way a person perceives it, versus someone else who watches it on an iPhone. Same idea, but from the other side. If you disagree, you're free to, but I think there's a reason that film crews work so incredibly hard on the lighting, the production design, the costumes, the makeup, the hair, the music, the score, the image, the framing, the blocking, everything -- because they know it all counts.The Canvas doesn't dictate the painting, and it's emotional connection the the audience.
Exactly. People don't understand just how cheap these things are to buy, use, and sell!If your shooting a 100,000 movie,
You take a slice of the budget; use partial for a down on a business lease to acquire a RED camera or get a loan and do payments from that budget while filming the movie and then, when the film is done sell the package for 80% of what you paid ( pay the loan off ) and that would be cheaper than renting a RED in total.
Now you have a top quality image and hardly much from the budget went to that camera in the end!
In the earlier days (i.e., pre-2004) pretty much all TV editing of film was done with the pulldown intact. The film was transferred to 29.97 video with pulldown, and edited as 60i and broadcast as 60i.Barry, if my intended target is television, do I have to remove pulldown on 24p or can I edit and render with the puldown for broadcast? Thanks.
Neither. I'd choose option 3, a great DP like Macgregor and I'd beg/borrow/steal an appropriate camera for him to shoot on. I'd cheat on that Kobiyashi Maru test!If you had to choose between a great dp with a Can Xl1 or a crappy dp with 35mm film, which would you choose?
Point in fact, I don't know how many of you were actively replacing your music collections when CDs first came out some 25 years ago, but I was in a music store and CDs used to be marked with a code of "AAD" or "ADD" or "DDD", to show whether it had been recorded, mastered, and delivered in analog or digital. And I heard two guys talking and one of 'em said "dude, man, I won't buy *anything* that's not DDD."The music analogy works for me as well. Some of my favorite recorded music is extremely lo-fi.
The music analogy works for me as well. Some of my favorite recorded music is extremely lo-fi.
It can certainly affect it. Most certainly it can. To put it in reverse -- seeing a film in Imax can absolutely impact the way a person perceives it, versus someone else who watches it on an iPhone.
Neither. I'd choose option 3, a great DP like Macgregor and I'd beg/borrow/steal an appropriate camera for him to shoot on. I'd cheat on that Kobiyashi Maru test!