Ok so comparing the HVX200 and the FX1, after lighting is brought into account and after all post production work, the HVX200 comes out on top in terms of picture quality? Despite the large pixel diffrence?
Pixels have nothing to do with it, they are comparably sharp. If you want low-noise imagery, the Sony excels at that. If you want the filmlike look and cinegamma and variable frame rates and all that stuff, the HVX wins handily.
