Outlander... Beowulf meets Science Fiction

Nektonic

Veteran
Outlanderposter.jpg


I finally got to see this great little medium budget film that was supposed to be released theatrically, and only ended up being out for a week in a few theaters. Anyways, its out on DVD now.

http://www.amazon.com/Outlander-Jam...ef=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=dvd&qid=1243741484&sr=1-1

If you like action, science fiction, old Norse legends, sword and sorcery (think Conan type of stories), or genre films with some suspense and fun action then check this one out. It is a somewhat cheesy premise that is handled with a decent amount of gravitas. It could've been handled in a really cheesy way, but they boldly chose to take this seriously. Most of the film takes place in the Norse world, but there are a few otherworldly scenes that had a great old school science fiction feel to them. When I say old school, I don't mean B-movie quality. What I mean is the kind of stuff you might read in an older science fiction novel that took its world and premise seriously. I loved these scenes as well as the Norse world they created. Both worlds' came across as real but also had that sense of underlying magic that makes these types of films so cool and fun.

There isn't a massive amount of character development, but for this type of film there is plenty and it works just fine. It is just one of those films that despite having a simple story, it is just enjoyable and it works. They didn't blow their wad action and spectacle-wise early on either. The film took enough time to establish the characters and the world before the monster starts to really go wild. Acting was good too. Production design and music was as well.

One thing that really grabbed me was the creature. Not only the technical quality of the effects, which were great, but the creature actually has a motivation beyond just being a murderous beast for the protagonist to kill. I actually felt sympathy for this thing once some of the backstory about it was revealed.

The action isn't as epic as a 100 million dollar super hero film of something like Lord of the Rings, but it was still fun and exciting. If you like films like Predator, then this is right up your alley. It isn't horror movie scary, but has some suspenseful scenes and pretty good action. The action also drove the story and didn't feel gratuitous at all.

The effects are surprisingly really well done considering the amount of shots they had on a lower budget. There wasn't a shot that stood out as being an unfinished effects shot. Most big blockbusters these days usually have one or two of those botched FX shots that pull you out of the film for a second. Outlander didn't have anything dodgy effects wise. Of course WETA did the effects, so no surprise on the quality level.

The only complaint is that some shots during the night scenes looked a little washed out in the blacks. I assume that this is due to the film's distributors, the Weinstein Company not really caring about this film. Of course, being a lower budgeted film, it could be that the cinematographer didn't have the time or tools to get everything perfect. Until I hear otherwise, my guess would be that the DVD transfer was possibly rushed to save money. There isn't even a Blu-ray announced for this yet, which saddens me because I would like to purchase this film in HD someday.

It is too bad that Outlander got buried by its distributor, just like another fun sci-fi action flick called Equilibrium did back in 2002. It really deserves to be seen, especially by fans of sci-fi, fantasy, and action. It really is a fun and interesting sci-fi twist on the Beowulf myth.
 
Last edited:
I was just thinking equilibrium as well after reading your review.

There seems to be a lot of advertisement for it now that it's on DVD. Maybe they felt it would only work as equilibrium, something that spreads by word of mouth.

Anyways, I was curious about this, not sure if it would suck, but thanks for posting, I'll be sure to pick it up now.
 
Saw this two days ago. Gotta say, I wasn't impressed. I wasn't disappointed mind you...just *shrug*. Great effects work though, IMO.
 
Saw this two days ago. Gotta say, I wasn't impressed. I wasn't disappointed mind you...just *shrug*. Great effects work though, IMO.

Even if this didn't impress you or if you didn't like it a ton, isn't it surprising that this film got ignored by its distributors? There was almost no advertising for this. Technically it is certainly not direct-to-home-video quality at all.
 
Even if this didn't impress you or if you didn't like it a ton, isn't it surprising that this film got ignored by its distributors? There was almost no advertising for this. Technically it is certainly not direct-to-home-video quality at all.

Maybe the question has more to do with a "how do you sell this?" rather than "is it good enough quality."

I haven't seen it yet (just rented it), but it seems like it's a hard sell. I was hesitant to rent it, and only decided to after hearing these posts.

Seems like a stupid idea to be honest. A guy from the future joins up with vikings to kill a dragon like alien creature? Hmm... sounds like a hard sell, and that's a huge risk/investment for producers to spend the money to get it into theaters. But that's just my opinion.

Gonna watch it and see.
 
Seems like a stupid idea to be honest. A guy from the future joins up with vikings to kill a dragon like alien creature? Hmm... sounds like a hard sell, and that's a huge risk/investment for producers to spend the money to get it into theaters.

Well, a very simple pitch for Outlander would be Beowulf with a sci-fi slant/twist. I won't ruin the film for you, but you're not exactly right when you say that there is a guy from the future. You'll know what I'm talking about once you watch it.

As for Outlander being a hard sell, the moment I first heard about this movie I was excited by its premise. I remember reading Beowulf in a high school english class, and I loved it. Add to that the fact that I'm a sci-fi nut. So I guess I fall into the target market for this film, where as something like Confessions of a Shopaholic would be a hard sell to a dude like me.

What makes Outlander a harder sell than something like Transformers? Forget the built in brand awareness of the Transformers cartoon. The concept of cars and trucks turning into robots seems pretty far fetched and silly. How about something like The Matrix, or The Terminator when those were not yet released? How about something like the original Highlander (which is on the remake track now)? Their basic story concepts were pretty wild and not proven yet at that time, but also a lot of fun and pretty clever and just plain cool.
 
While I don't think this would be the hardest film to market, I do think that having a lead whose name isn't instantly recognizable (or even pronouncable, in some circles :D) would make it tougher for people to dish out the dough to see it in theatres. Especially with sci-fi/action flicks like Transformers and Wolverine taking up space in said theatres and raising the expectations of sci-fi spectacle.
 
This little movie wasn't bad. It never surprised me in any way, I pretty much got what I was expecting from it but I was entertained. A b-movie through and through but a well made one. Looked great on blu-ray. The film isn't huge in budget but hell, its effects are as good as any a-list hollywood blockbuster released in the 80's or early 90's. Why this got unceremoniously dumped by its distributor is a mystery. If they had released it at the right time, say mid-February, it could have made a decent haul at the box office.
 
I actually thought it was better than Equilibrium...More in the class of Pitch Black. I thought Equilibrium was one of those movies that was ALMOST really good, but every now and then has a moment or idea that turns it cheesy and ridiculous. I'm sorry, but GUNKATA!?...It's definitely better. The worse that could be said about Outlander is that it's kind of humorless and obvious in its plotting. It never rises above its b-movie monster flick ambitions, but it does fulfill them completely.
 
Back
Top