KyleProhaska
Veteran
I've been caught between using the 5D and the AF100 for an upcoming feature I'm shooting. Low-budget, but they have some money to throw around. I probably could afford a higher end system, but for the sake of argument lets just stick to these two.
Both camera's offer their own strengths, and I own both. AF100 would require me to use my older Nikon Glass which is still very sharp to my eye and works well. 5D would have me using L series glass, which we all know is good stuff. The real reason I've been going to the AF100 as my likely choice is because of the video-village issues and the annoying 480i output when recording. On this flick, I just don't want people waiting on me because I blew the focus. On my AF100 it'll give me a nice 1080pSDI signal all the time, with peaking that'll make focus a breeze.
How has the 480i been handled on any sets you've been on? Any horror stories? I mean these DSLRs are soft to begin with, and not having critical focus just makes things even worse.
Thoughts?
Both camera's offer their own strengths, and I own both. AF100 would require me to use my older Nikon Glass which is still very sharp to my eye and works well. 5D would have me using L series glass, which we all know is good stuff. The real reason I've been going to the AF100 as my likely choice is because of the video-village issues and the annoying 480i output when recording. On this flick, I just don't want people waiting on me because I blew the focus. On my AF100 it'll give me a nice 1080pSDI signal all the time, with peaking that'll make focus a breeze.
How has the 480i been handled on any sets you've been on? Any horror stories? I mean these DSLRs are soft to begin with, and not having critical focus just makes things even worse.
Thoughts?