puredrifting
Major Contributor
You have EXACTLY the same risk with ANY wireless system.
Whether you are using a $99 Saramonic 150 MHz VHF with 30-year old technology or the latest digital kit from Lectro or Zaxcom.
Which is why we never use wireless if we can possibly use a hard-wired solution.
For that matter, the modern 2.4GHz systems use 21st century technology that maximizes your chances of finding a usable channel. And typically they have already selected a "backup" channel for instant fallback in case anything happens to the primary channel.
Yes, if you read the fine print on the Rødes, this is exactly what they do and the channel switching transition is seamless. I used mine on the floor of the 2017 RSA Tradeshow, which is a corporate security and firewall convention up at Moscone Center. I am sure there was a lot of 2.4GHz usage going on all around us with hundreds of booths and lots of wireless activity. We did not experience a single hit, glitch, or noise blast in seven hours of shooting. That proved the new technology to me that day. Not saying it's bulletproof, just easier to deal with and so far, more reliable than my UHF systems that I own. I am with Richard, I avoid wireless as much as I can but there certain scenarios when they are the only way.