OIS or no OIS with 14-140 kit lens + hack?

alignment1

Well-known member
tried searching this, but no dice

I'm using the 40Mbps reliability patch- will be shooting 720p60 and was wondering when using the kit lens and being zoomed all the way in, (some shots hand held-w/shoulder rig)- is optimal to use OIS or leave it off?

thanks

Z
 
i hoped software stabilization wud do the trick, but it couldnt save blurred frames from handheld camera while walking. the hack cant save it either. a shoulder rig can mitigate the issue... but too heavy. i want 14-140 because of ois and stepless aperture.
 
The IS in the lenses will never be as good as a good steadicam unless your arms are made of stone. I wonder if the IS would be beneficial when on a steady cam like this though? The steady cam prevents rotation and the IS should prevent translation.

http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=380268957524&ssPageName=STRK:MEWAX:IT

mmc.jpg
 
true. ois cant replace the steadicam feature. but so much hassle to set it up for candid video.

btw whats good stabilizer steadicam for 14-140mm?
 
I wonder if the IS would be beneficial when on a steady cam like this though? The steady cam prevents rotation and the IS should prevent translation.
Maybe, but IS won't prevent the whole camera from falling off the Hague's tiny ball bearing if someone happens to jostle your arm...
 
Maybe, but IS won't prevent the whole camera from falling off the Hague's tiny ball bearing if someone happens to jostle your arm...

Is it bad? I am interested in getting one of these. However, I don't want to spend over $150 on it.
 
Is it bad?
It's not bad to use with a videocam you don't mind risking. Like most inexpensive steadicam rigs, it's very sensitive to weight distribution and not very convenient to adjust or operate. I ordered one and sent it back the same day I got it. To their credit, Hague were very polite and stood by their warranty.
 
Maybe, but IS won't prevent the whole camera from falling off the Hague's tiny ball bearing if someone happens to jostle your arm...

ROFL!

I have heard similar fears... otherwise I thought it looked like a good design.

Did you find one you liked in the end>?
 
Did you find one you liked in the end?
Not really, I think these things really need cpu-controlled fly-by-wire balancing to work reliably. For ad-hoc shooting, a half-extended Manfrotto 560B monopod (lifted off the ground with one hand) has worked well as a stabilizer for me.
 
Maybe I'm the only one who like it, but the ONLY thing i'm looking for in the lens for the GH1 it's a stabilizer.. It's so good!
I'm waiting Panasonic put the stabilizer everywhere, even in a 20mm 1.7..
 
i hoped software stabilization wud do the trick, but it couldnt save blurred frames from handheld camera while walking. the hack cant save it either. a shoulder rig can mitigate the issue... but too heavy. i want 14-140 because of ois and stepless aperture.

I think walking around in general with any small hand held camera will yield the same results. have you tried the strap trick? hold the camera out so there s enough tension on the strap around your neck. I have never tried it myself but have heard its better than nothing.
 
Last edited:
...the ONLY thing i'm looking for in the lens for the GH1 it's a stabilizer...
For a flexible wide-angle lens, I think the Lumix 14-45mm f3.5-4 is a better choice than either the 20mm pancake or the 14-140mm zoom. The 14-45mm is one stop faster than the 14-140mm and much more compact. It's also wider than the 20mm and has IS built-in. The 20mm is unmatched in low-light conditions, but in daylight or in a small room it's not so usable.

The ultimate wide-angle zoom is currently the Olympus 14-54mm f2.8-3.5 Mark II. But while it has auto-focus, it doesn't have IS and it's even bulkier than the Lumix 14-140mm.
 
Back
Top