Hi Everyone,
Referencing a recent post (GH2 vs NIkon d5100), I studied both links LPowell wrote from PersonalView.Com. I noticed LPowell you took a video of a tree and said that even at 66 mb/s that wasn't enough to conceal the high noise of the GH2 when compared to the d5100 footage of the tree. At the conclusion of this comparison, you said an unhacked GH2 won't have the same low noise/high dynamic range as the d5100, but above 66 mpbs, you said that the hacked GH2 is in a class on its own.
Notwithstanding the noted noise issue of the un-hacked GH2 (as compared above), providing you filmed on a hacked GH2 *above* 66 Mbps, would this alleviate the noise/lower range? Would the noise and dynamic range be better than the Nikon if the GH2 was above 66 Mbps? Or, will the GH2, when compared to D-SLRs, always have the same noise/lower DR regardless of whether hacked or un-hacked?
Referencing a recent post (GH2 vs NIkon d5100), I studied both links LPowell wrote from PersonalView.Com. I noticed LPowell you took a video of a tree and said that even at 66 mb/s that wasn't enough to conceal the high noise of the GH2 when compared to the d5100 footage of the tree. At the conclusion of this comparison, you said an unhacked GH2 won't have the same low noise/high dynamic range as the d5100, but above 66 mpbs, you said that the hacked GH2 is in a class on its own.
Notwithstanding the noted noise issue of the un-hacked GH2 (as compared above), providing you filmed on a hacked GH2 *above* 66 Mbps, would this alleviate the noise/lower range? Would the noise and dynamic range be better than the Nikon if the GH2 was above 66 Mbps? Or, will the GH2, when compared to D-SLRs, always have the same noise/lower DR regardless of whether hacked or un-hacked?
Last edited: