"No Can Defend"

BobbyMurcerFan

Well-known member
I just got back from an open house at the American Society of Cinematographers, and was surprised that a number of DP's brought up the AF100. I heard the AF footage described as "lovely," "beautiful."

I came away thinking that right now, the AF100 is the best entry level real digital cinema camera.

There is the F3, but it's much more expensive. Yes it will be able to do 4:4:4 w/ a firmware upgrade, but the sensor is still Bayer, so the extra chroma data is a result of interpolation more than anything else. And there is the problem of how to record the data. External RGB recorders are expensive. But I don't kid myself into thinking that the F3 won't look better than the AF, it will. But at a price.

There is Red's fixed Scarlet, but you are limited to 2/3rd's. Yes it can be workable, but if you are doing cinematography it's about learning and knowing your options. 2/3rd's does restrict what you can compose significantly. All these guys talked about experimenting, doing wild things in terms of focal length, f stop and framing. The Scarlet is limited in this regard.

The DSLR's are too much of a kludge, have image issues and lack in other features that have all been well documented.

So, in my opinion, at present time, the AF100 is the pound for pound, dollar for dollar, digital cinema camera king.
 
Last edited:
And this is why so many people bought one and also more than likely why Panasonic didn't make it P2. I mean why make it P2 when it already is a god send to most people.
 
I'm going to be lucky enough to have an ASC DP friend of mine shoot my upcoming short. I had a meeting with him last Thursday and the first word he said about the camera was "beautiful". He also shared with me that he has always disliked the Sony plasticy pictures and is through working with Reds due to all their glitchy problems. He raved about the Alexa though.

So to me it says a lot that this guy who is used to shooting film and Red and Arri Alexas can say first thing out of his mouth "beautiful" about the AF100 images.

He repeated to me whats been said on.this board: no you can't push around the image like you can shooting RAW but he also he no concern about the chroma clipping fascination of late when I asked.
 
I also have no concern about Chroma clipping.

I would aslo say that my CC Grading tests ( Colorista II. S.A and Da Vinci Resolve) have given me a surprising amount of confidence in the abilty to "push this stuff "around". RAW it aint but do have confidence in your D.P and Colorist.
 
I also have no concern about Chroma clipping.

I would aslo say that my CC Grading tests ( Colorista II. S.A and Da Vinci Resolve) have given me a surprising amount of confidence in the abilty to "push this stuff "around". RAW it aint but do have confidence in your D.P and Colorist.

Your experiences with the AF sound exactly like mine, Shooter.
 
Yeah Mick.

I am rolling into a shoot week following this one and I will be shooting AF102 on it. 22 new scenes to replace all the table top and food shots in eleven TVCs originally shot 35mm film ( beautifully).

I am not even bothering to telling the agency about the camera ( its written on the call sheet should they choose to look that far down) ... but my test with the colorist and the post house have absolutely confirmed ...no issues.

I am totally confident in the little Panny. ( and of course I would prefer 4:2:2)
 
Back
Top