Nikon or Canon mount? In which lenses to invest?

A

alohype

Veteran
Currently I do not own a lot of lenses, so I am completely open.
What are advantages or disadvantages to go one lenses versus the other?
I do not mind reversed focus ring with Nikon. I know on Nikon lenses you have aperture control directly on them, are there any disadvantages of that design?

Also, which zoom lens would you recommend to buy first for FS700? Thinking of 24-70 range (2.8 preferably), not sure about brand: Tamron, Sigma?

Many thanks for your help and expertise!
 
FWIW, the preponderance of lens adapters on the market seem to be for Canon EOS mount lenses. Canon FD lenses are fine lenses with aperture rings, as well. Not to say anything negative about Nikon optics. I think you'll find the optical differences between Nikon Canon are trivial. The "smart" adapters, like Metabones, seem to be qualified with certain Canon lenses. While Tokina, Samsung, Rokinon, Tamron make fine optics, they don't work as well with smart adapters.

Just my .02 worth.
 
I jumped over to Nikon after my Metabones was glitching out on some of my lenses. Decided to stop relying on electronic "smart" adapters.

And while it's not an elegant solution, there are adapters for Nikon to Canon, so if I wanted to use my Nikon glass on a C300 or something, I could.

The main tradeoff made is that if the lens itself doesn't have an aperture ring (like the Nikon 17-55 and 24-70), you don't know exactly what your f-stop is. You also don't get any image stabilization from the lens. So there are pros and cons. Personally I felt like Nikon is a more adaptable lens and the physical aperture pin makes it easier/cheaper to adapt to a lot of cameras.
 
Nikon 24-70 G range have always been regarded as the best zooms but I think the MK2 canon version is just as good.

I use Nikon all G series and love em, super sharp and smooth.
 
Both. For primes I use a set of Zeiss ZFs in Nikon mount. It's nice to have the aperture ring so you can avoid electronic adapters. And there is something really special about the Zeiss look. I just love it.

For zooms unfortunately, electronic adapters are the main option so Canon is pretty nice because they work on Sony, Canon, BMC, Micro 4/3rds and RED. Image Stabilization is really nice.
 
I vote Canon. Why? Because that is what I get asked for 9/10 times. Meaning some jobs they don't care what gear/lenses I have. BUT if there is a requirement or I have to have my lenses match with someone else's that is bringing their own gear then 9 times out of ten they want me to have Canon lenses.

Beyond that it is just personal preference. They are very similar in practical aspects. And it isn't like splitting hairs over getting high end cine lenses so don't lose any sleep.
 
Problem with Canon is the fact that 24-70 2.8 does not have Image Stabilisation which is a real shame. Because of a lot run n gun it is quite essential for me, that's why I am looking for alternatives. Choice is between Tamron and Sigma I guess.
 
slipstrea808 said:
I vote Canon. Why? Because that is what I get asked for 9/10 times. Meaning some jobs they don't care what gear/lenses I have. BUT if there is a requirement or I have to have my lenses match with someone else's that is bringing their own gear then 9 times out of ten they want me to have Canon lenses.

Beyond that it is just personal preference. They are very similar in practical aspects. And it isn't like splitting hairs over getting high end cine lenses so don't lose any sleep.
Click to expand...
But if someone wants "Canon" lenses, I'll just throw cheap adapters on my Nikon glass! :)
 
alohype said:
Problem with Canon is the fact that 24-70 2.8 does not have Image Stabilisation which is a real shame. Because of a lot run n gun it is quite essential for me, that's why I am looking for alternatives. Choice is between Tamron and Sigma I guess.
Click to expand...

Get the Canon 24-105 f4 and pair it with SpeedBooster for a 17-75 f2.8 with Image Stabilization. I use this for most run and gun and it's awesome. Be careful with Tamron and Sigma as they have more compatibility issues with Metabones which tends to favor the more common Canon lenses.
 
I ran Nikons the first year and a half I had my FS700, then switched to Canon. Mostly for the stabilization. With the nikons and adapter--I have both novaflex and metabones SB--you get a clickless aperture, but the throw is so short, I was never able to do "live" adjustments. With the Canons and metabones you have clicked aperture changes. I now have a Canon 24-70 f4 and 70-200 f4 and love the stabilization (and the light weight) though I'd still give the IQ edge to my old Nikon 24-70. When I made the switch I borrowed a Canon 24-105 f4, Tamron 24-70 2.8 and rented the Canon 24-70 f4 to compare. Based on weight, quality of stabilization and image I chose the Canon 24-70, but they are all great lenses.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top