I mean I didn't make up the title. the topic of this thread is the title of the article, word for word. It's just a thread about the article. If you don't like the title of the article, well I didn't write it.
Newegg: "Federal Judge rules Commercial Drones are 100% Completely Legal"
- Thread starter Gillvane
- Start date
I mean I didn't make up the title. the topic of this thread is the title of the article, word for word. It's just a thread about the article. If you don't like the title of the article, well I didn't write it.
Andrius Simutis
Veteran
There's no requirement for you to post their title. If you really wanted to you could put in a qualifier like Newegg claims "insert hyperbolic title here". There's no reason to spread their misinformation that was most likely worded that way as click bait or to move sales of drones.
Finn Yarbrough
Well-known member
I'm afraid I have to agree with Andrius here (did anybody ask my opinion?)
A more accurate headline would be: "Federal Judge Rules Current FAA Regulations Lack Wording to Regulate Commercial Use of R/C Craft"
A more accurate headline would be: "Federal Judge Rules Current FAA Regulations Lack Wording to Regulate Commercial Use of R/C Craft"
When I discuss an article, I generally post the title of the article. Same as in the film forum, when you post the title of the film.
Andrius Simutis
Veteran
Nobody is challenging your ethics or questioning your style here. It's just that the title of the article is misleading and you're continuing that misinformation by using it verbatim without any qualifiers.
Finn Yarbrough
Well-known member
...and every time we comment anew on the misleading nature of the title, we bump it back to the top so more people can be mislead by it! The irony!
Interestingly, I watched the Masters Golf Tournament held in Augusta, Georgia on Sunday, April 13th.
There must have been at least a half dozen aerial shots that were obtained with a multi rotor.
I don't believe a GoPro was used due to the quality of the shots, but several of the views clearly showed the shadow of the multi rotor in the shot.
There must have been at least a half dozen aerial shots that were obtained with a multi rotor.
I don't believe a GoPro was used due to the quality of the shots, but several of the views clearly showed the shadow of the multi rotor in the shot.